Re: PL/SQL vs Java speed in 10g

From: Tim Gorman <tim_at_sagelogix.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:40:34 -0700
Message-ID: <BC49D672.FD5D%tim@sagelogix.com>

Why would Oracle claim that PL/SQL is dead when all Java stored procedures have to be encapsulated in PL/SQL wrappers?

on 2/6/04 3:30 PM, Jesse, Rich at Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com wrote:

> Just reading the whitepaper "PL/SQL Just Got Faster" from OTN, it seems like
> Oracle's done a fair amount of efficiency tuning of PL/SQL in 10g, both in
> math and in the code generator / PVM. For example, integer math has been
> moved from software libraries to hardware ops, resulting in a 2.5 - 3 times
> improvement in integer math speed (according to the paper).
>
> So has Oracle abandoned it's pre-10g stance of "PL/SQL is dead -- convert to
> Java"?
>
> Just curious if anyone's done any perf testing yet...
>
> Rich
>
> Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
> rich.jesse_at_qtiworld.com QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:40:34 CST