Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

RE: ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

From: Jeroen van Sluisdam <jeroen.van.sluisdam_at_vrijuit.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:19:26 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005DAEAF.20031223141926@fatcity.com>


Hi,

I'm using oracle 9.2.0.4. I put it off tonight with the statement You mentioned and unfortunately no success.

Maybe interesting to know that I started without the event 4030 set And I get the following ora-600 in my alert file: Tue Dec 23 16:46:42 2003
Errors in file /var/opt/oracle/product/admin/VU_2/udump/vu_2_ora_15251.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17271], [instantiation space leak], [], [], [], [], [],
This one is reproducible without the event set and a pga_aggregate_target set either 250Mb or 160Mb

With the event set I got the following error Errors in file /var/opt/oracle/product/admin/VU_2/udump/vu_2_ora_10264.trc: ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2464 bytes (cursor work he,rworalo : rwordops)
Tue Dec 23 14:24:40 2003
Errors in file /var/opt/oracle/product/admin/VU_2/udump/vu_2_ora_10249.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17271], [instantiation space leak], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 32 bytes (callheap,allocator state)
This second tracefile lead me to the sql-statement which explained with a very nice result

When I issued the statement to set off auto handling I did not get any such error in my alert file but my batch returned again after an hour With

ERROR at line 1:
ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 56 bytes (callheap,PESBLT space)

Could a UX kernel parameter be of any influence here, like max data segment? Could it help to increase this to say 3Gb. Note that we have 4Gb physical memory and 4Gb swap configured.

I used to run this in an oracle 7 enviroment on hpux 10.20 and now we moved To 64bit hpux11.11. I can imagine oracle is using more memory here than compared to oracle 7 with the same program such that in the old environment we might stayed below 2Gb and now we are exceeding this.

For what it might be worth, this batch is quite big. Sofar this seems to be the only program having memory problems. I have put back workare_size_policy=auto back to be on the safe default side.

I hope you can give some more leads because this is quite confusing And causing me headaches because it is causing troubles in my production environment. By the way we tested the migration ofcourse but this batch was not included in the test.

Regards,

Jeroen
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill_at_cybcon.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 23 december 2003 18:34 Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

I'm using auto pga allocation on 9.2.0.3 without any problem.

You don't mention which version.

You can turn it off with 'alter system set workarea_size_policy=manual;

Jared

On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 07:24, Jeroen van Sluisdam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an ora-4030 problem related to pga memory allocation, at least I
have
> concluded sofar
> This program is batch written in pl/sql and after an hour or so it
crashes.
> PGA allocated is slowly exceeding
> 2Gb and when I monitor with top I see the process size rising uptill 2 Gb
> somewhere.
> Last week we migrated from on oracle 7 environment where this program ran
> smoothly for years.
> At the same time we migrated the OS also and started with new machines.
The
> ux kernel parameter
> for max data segment size is 2Gb.
>
> I had an oracle consultant here for migration and he advised to put
> pga_aggegrate_target on 250M. Box has
> 4Gb, shared_pool_size is 250Mb, SGA is almost 800Mb
>
> I issued a tar and Oracle advised me to remove pga_aggegrate_target from
the
> init_file, but because this is production I cannot restart that
> easily (online changes are allowed ony from min. value 10M)
> I also tested this program with event :
> alter session set events '4030 trace name errorstack level 3'; I found the
> so called SQL-statement that might be causing this
> but explaining this plan gave me an even better plan than on the oracle 7
> environment Oracle support still has to get back to me with
> latest things.
>
> This program is clearly running wild on memory. Based on the docs on
> metalink I lowered the pga_aggegrate_target to 160M
> now and I'm testing this right now. Is there any way to protect your
system
> from memory consumption like this case. Are there any
> other parameters to consider?
>
> Details: oracle 9.2.0.4 HPUX 11.11, 4Gb phys memory
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jeroen

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: jkstill_at_cybcon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jeroen van Sluisdam
  INET: jeroen.van.sluisdam_at_vrijuit.nl

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue Dec 23 2003 - 16:19:26 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US