Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: dbms_stats

RE: dbms_stats

From: Bala, Prakash <prakash.bala_at_hp.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:29:27 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005D8B44.20031203202927@fatcity.com>


The reason why we switched from 'analyze table .. 10 percent' is because when we partitioned some of the huge tables, the query performance against these tables was really bad. 'Gather_table_stats' with size 2 on indexed columns did a much better job.

Have you had issues with 'analyze' against partitioned tables?

-----Original Message-----
Wolfgang Breitling
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:29 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

In Oracle 8i you may as well stick with analyze since the dbms_stats call you use translates simply into a

   "analyze table ... ESTIMATE statistics sample 10 percent FOR TABLE FOR ALL INDEXES for all indexed columns size 2"

Why did you go from a simple analyze to gathering histograms on all indexed columns? I question the rationale of gathering histograms of "size 2". Aside from that, I question the rationale of a blanket histogram gathering (regardless of # of buckets) on "all indexed" or "all" columns. Histograms are like medicine. In the right (i.e. sparing dose) they are a therapeutic tool. In the wrong, especially too high dose, they become poison.

At 02:04 PM 12/3/2003, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Oracle 8.1.7.4 on HP-UX 11i
>
>A week ago, we replaced 'analyze table ... estimate statistics sample 10
>percent' with dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats('x', estimate_percent=>10,
>cascade=>true, degree=>4, method_opt=>''for all indexed columns size 2')
>
>Performace is good against partitioned tables but not for non-partitioned
>tables.
>
>Saw a note in Metalink that its better to do the above with
>'cascade=>false' and then do a gather_index_stats separately.
>
>In my tests, I see that 'analyze' makes the CBO use an index while
>dbms_stats is making the CBO to use a FTS instead.
>
>Have you faced any similar issues?
>
>
>TIA
>Prakash

Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Wolfgang Breitling
  INET: breitliw_at_centrexcc.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Bala, Prakash
  INET: prakash.bala_at_hp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Wed Dec 03 2003 - 22:29:27 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US