Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Oracle 9i physical IO - why only one block reads

Oracle 9i physical IO - why only one block reads

From: Biddell, Ian <ian.biddell_at_hp.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:34:26 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005D8550.20031201023426@fatcity.com>






Hi All,
 
I am running a big batch reporting program that does way too much SQL (but that's another story)
and when I profile the trace file apart from one pice of SQL all the others are only doing 1 block reads.
As you can see from the example below it did 63,209 physical IO calls and they were all for one block only
Even though it's via Primary Key why doesn't Oracle get even more than one block per read if the index range scan is long?
This is just an example from about 45 SQL statements that have the one block reads only.
My multi block read count is 64 on an 8K blocksize, oracle 9.2
 
 
 
                                            --------- Duration Per Call ----------- --- Detail of Max --
Blocks per Read         Duration    # Calls         Avg            Min          Max   Data Block Address
----------------- -------------- ---------- ----------- -------------- ------------ --------------------
1                   469s  100.0%     63,209   0.007423s      0.000544s    0.140338s              5:61755

I would have thought I would get more like one of the rare statements that gets 75% at 64 blocks per read.
ie.
62                    0s    0.1%          4   0.037230s      0.034101s    0.044109s              5:681746
63                    0s    0.4%         18   0.039499s      0.034724s    0.062682s              9:706507
64                  129s   75.8%      3,451   0.037441s      0.015427s    0.189772s              9:705852
 
 
Explain plan of staement
 
SELECT STATEMENT                     Cost = 510                     0-0-510 
....SORT             AGGREGATE                                      1-0-1 
........TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  ALLOCATION_TRANSACTION_B       2-1-1 34
............INDEX    RANGE SCAN      ALLOCATION_TRANSACTION_PK      3-2-1 680
 
 
Thanks for any direction to the answer I can be given, just so I can understand more about what's happening
 
Thanks :-)
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Biddell, Ian
  INET: ian.biddell_at_hp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Dec 01 2003 - 04:34:26 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US