Oracle-L: Re: 32 or 64?

From: Joe Testa <jtesta_at_dmc-it.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:29:24 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005CB5BF.20030818082924@fatcity.com>

well some OS you're forced to at some level, but my understanding is UNLESS you build the database with 64 bit binaies, just chaging the word size supposedly doesn't let you gain any of the 64 bit performance enhancements, fact or fiction, someone willing to elaborate?

joe

Daniel Fink wrote:

>>From a technical and business perspective, what are the reasons to migrate from 32-bit to 64-bit Oracle? Are there known bugs/problems with one version that are not present in the other?
>
>Daniel Fink
>

-- 
Joseph S Testa
Chief Technology Officer 
Data Management Consulting
p: 614-791-9000
f: 614-791-9001


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Joe Testa
  INET: jtesta_at_dmc-it.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Received on Mon Aug 18 2003 - 11:29:24 CDT