Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 for tablespaces

RE: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 for tablespaces

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:49:25 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005CAB89.20030814124925@fatcity.com>


But if the little CD drive on the server that doesn't understand multi-session cds isn't for Stairway to Heaven what on earth can be its purpose? Surely every it-professional knows that you install from a network location whilst listening to music on the Headphones - how else do you avoid mgmt saying 'is it installed yet?'

Niall

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ml-errors_at_fatcity.com [mailto:ml-errors_at_fatcity.com] On
> Behalf Of Mladen Gogala
> Sent: 14 August 2003 14:59
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 for tablespaces
>
>
> It robs of CPU power, that's true, but I've never seen a
> place where CPU consumption would go above 30% on average. If
> it does, then it's time to upgrade, or to quote the Taco Bell
> dog, you need a bigger box. With approximately 70% left idle,
> companies usually have a few percent of the CPU power to
> dedicate for RAID-0. After all, all those boxes have nfs
> daemons, sendmail, lpd/lp/CUPS, xdm/gdm, automounter and some
> other daemons running. Database server seldomly needs
> to export file systems, route mail (well, that comes in handy
> here and there), manipulate printers or scan the units for a
> music CD. If I want to play Kashmir or Stairway To Heaven,
> I'm not going to (ab)use my database server for that purpose.
> Those few percent spent on RAID-0 are quite insignificant in
> comparison with the CPU percentage wasted by routed, gated,
> walld, talkd, xdm
> and alike. The sad truth is that people no longer tune their
> systems, because a bigger system is actually cheaper then an
> SA needed to tune it properly. We're talking about the SUV mentality
> translated into IT. You don't actually care whether an
> additional gallon of washing liquid is
> wasting space in your SUV when you have enough room to
> accommodate a medium sized elementary school in your vehicle.
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Millsap
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:39 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> Problem with head-to-head price comparisons is that software
> RAID level 0 has hidden costs that a lot of folk might not
> understand before purchasing. For example, I would argue that
> software RAID level 0 costs a heck of a lot more than the
> list price, because it robs CPU capacity from your applications.
>
>
> Cary Millsap
> Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
> http://www.hotsos.com
>
> Upcoming events:
> - Hotsos Clinic 101 in Denver, Sydney
> - Hotsos Symposium 2004, March 7-10 Dallas
> - Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Jesse, Rich
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
> How's about price? That's pretty important to some folk. :)
>
> Rich
>
> Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
> rjesse_at_qtiworld.com Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matthew Zito [mailto:mzito_at_gridapp.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:14 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: RE: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 for tablespaces
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The _only_ even theoretical advantage to software RAID-0 is that
> > software RAID implementations tend to have more flexibility than the
> > hardware ones.
> > For example, there are a number of software RAID
> > implementations that allow
> > you to grow RAID-0 volumes, something that is generally not
> allowed in
> > hardware RAID, and most of those allow you to do it online.
> > Some of the
> > better software RAID implementations even allow for online
> volume type
> > conversion - from RAID-1 to RAID-5 when adding a third disk
> > to a mirrored
> > pair, as a random example.
> >
> > Beyond that, there's no reason to have software RAID. Any other
> > extraneous advantages can be gleaned by using a traditional
> VM on top
> > of hardware RAID-ed devices. And even some of that stuff
> is better in
> > hardware. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Zito
> > GridApp Systems
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Jesse, Rich
> INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru')
> and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
> from). You may also send the HELP command for other
> information (like subscribing).
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Cary Millsap
> INET: cary.millsap_at_hotsos.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru')
> and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
> from). You may also send the HELP command for other
> information (like subscribing).
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Note:
> This message is for the named person's use only. It may
> contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived
> or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this
> message in error, please immediately delete it and all
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
> of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or
> indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy
> any part of this message if you are not the intended
> recipient. Wang Trading LLC and any of its subsidiaries
> each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail
> communications through its networks.
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> individual sender, except where the message states
> otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them
> to be the views of any such entity.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Mladen Gogala
> INET: mladen_at_wangtrading.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru')
> and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
> from). You may also send the HELP command for other
> information (like subscribing).
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Niall Litchfield
  INET: niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Aug 14 2003 - 15:49:25 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US