Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 for tablespaces

Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 for tablespaces

From: Tim Gorman <tim_at_sagelogix.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:44:26 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005CA575.20030812174426@fatcity.com>


The AIX LVM supports RAID-0 and RAID-1, but not together, as you state.

However, a rude form of RAID-0 can be achieved by specifying "max allocation policy", which will cause round-robin distribution of physical extents (PEs) across a list of physical volumes (PVs), thereby approximately RAID-0 at a large granularity (i.e. 4M, 8M, 16M per "stripe"). Still, it beats the heck out of RAID5...

on 8/12/03 12:24 PM, Schauss, Peter at peter.schauss_at_ngc.com wrote:

> Our hardware people tell me that our disk array will not support Raid 10.
> Given a choice between Raid 1 or 5 for my tablespaces, which one
> is best? This is Oracle 8.1.7 on AIX 4.3.3. The application will
> have a mix of read and write activity.
>
> Thanks,
> Peter Schauss

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Tim Gorman
  INET: tim_at_sagelogix.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue Aug 12 2003 - 20:44:26 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US