Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9i Grid "voodoo" cookbook

RE: 9i Grid "voodoo" cookbook

From: Gogala, Mladen <MGogala_at_oxhp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:39 -0400
Message-Id: <25977.338749@fatcity.com>


Microsoft is the world's largest provider of cluster f... solutions for the IT. Their OS has spawned $3G industry which has the sole purpose of trying to secure it. It is about time that they got some competition.

Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Phone:(203) 459-6855
Email:mgogala_at_oxhp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Odland, Brad [mailto:Brad.Odland_at_qtiworld.com] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: 9i Grid "voodoo" cookbook

(Yeah Tom Mercadante...I agree)

I remember a time when Microsoft was spouting Windows clustering and how great it was. People started with two boxes then kept adding until the whole mess fell apart. People and companies whet bust promoting cluster solutions. Rather than sizing a box appropriately and purchasing the hardware sized to handle five years of growth now we are looking at a cluster scenario again. Adding boxes as we go. Just how easy is that? What about future security issues? Patches...etc...

Frankly I find it hard to believe that anyone is going to save any money with blades and 9i RAC right now. Once again the hardware people have found that giving people less for the same cost is better (for them). Seems like the burden of testing and proving these cluster solutions is going to fall on us (IS). I mean really! Who would set this solution up and roll it into production in a weekend....?? I sure wouldn't expect that. I would expect to have to create a test lab, buy test hardware and prove that it actually works. Seems expensive to me. Somebody honestly tell me they would have no problem converting a 8 way HP-UX box to four dual blades and 9i RAC in a weekend. Different packaging is all we have here. RAC is like a "lunchable". Less product, more expensive, more marketing promises and leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Don't get me wrong I think the idea sounds cool. It's just that we've all heard of cool stuff turning into a hot steaming pile real fast...

IT budgets are stretched pretty thin. Buying unproven technology is not a very wise choice right now unless you have a lot of disposable cash for in house testing.

Why should IT have to prove this works?

Brad O.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Odland, Brad
  INET: Brad.Odland_at_qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L

(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Jul 21 2003 - 15:47:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US