Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Dimensional Modeling - b-tree vs. bitmapped indexes

RE: Dimensional Modeling - b-tree vs. bitmapped indexes

From: <Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:56:39 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.005B8AF6.20030624123450@fatcity.com>

Guys,

My understanding is that Oracle's Star Transformation Algorithm does bitmapped merges on the dimensions tables to pull out the FACTS in the FACT table rather efficiently and that you would use bitmapped indexes on your dimensions tables rather than btree.  However, noted a posted on data warehousing listserve which said "Oracle Expert" was strongly recommending b-tree.  I haven't used Oracle Expert very much - I don't trust it as much as the various traces, running queries and testing yourself.  I guess I feel like Oracle Expert would give you rule-of-thumb stuff and have lots of inherent problems in its "recommendations" - like exactly what you feed it.  I don't trust this over the testing and tracing to see what is happening with the CBO myself.  Any opinions?  Received on Tue Jun 24 2003 - 14:56:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US