RE: db file sequential read [WAS:wait event puzzler]

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:23:41 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.005B053A.20030612093449@fatcity.com>

<fun part>
What part of 'Thou Shalt Not have a column name larger than 30 characters' we didn't understand? </fun part>

<serious>

Senthil, it would be a welcome idea to try out a new algorithm, but changing DD is a _BAD_ idea, especially when you give it form of an advise to someone without any form of smiley or a disclaimer.

BYW the column name is what it is ... COLUMN NAME, not WAR AND PEACE ... </serious>

Raj

---

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Senthil Kumar D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: db file sequential read [WAS:wait event puzzler]
>
>
> I do agree with you. But some times we may need go beyond the scopes.
>
> For testing purpose we can do these kind of R&D's.
>
> Nothing wrong in this.
>
> Senthil.

*********************************************************************This e-mail 

message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank

you.*********************************************************************1

Received on Thu Jun 12 2003 - 12:23:41 CDT