Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Urgent: Need Oradim.exe for version 8.1.6

Re: Urgent: Need Oradim.exe for version 8.1.6

From: <Jared.Still_at_radisys.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:57:47 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.005AFA51.20030611163920@fatcity.com>


Here si oradim for 8.1..6.3 if you still need it.

Jared

"Naveen Nahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 06/11/2003 07:24 AM
 Please respond to ORACLE-L  

        To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Urgent: Need Oradim.exe for version 8.1.6


I need the Oradim.exe for version 8.1.6 as its got corrupted.

Can someone please zip it and send it to me?

Regards
Naveen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: sql query optimization
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> From what you have said the cost of distinct and the function call
> shouldn't be a big deal. I did wonder if you can use
> to_number with an
> appropriate mask to avoid the function call but it's probably not even
> worth bothering.
>
> Simplifying the connect by sub-query will hopefully provide
> the boost you
> need. The concatenated index relates to my uncertainty about
> how Oracle
> can use them for recursive SQL. I did a simple test - creating the
> following indexes:
>
> 1) Unique index on child
> 2) Non-unique index on parent
> 3) Unique index on parent, child
> 4) Unique index on child, parent
>
> The table only had a handful of rows but Oracle chose to use
> index 1 and
> index 3 for the query instead of index 2. On a table of
> significant volume
> (I used to work on very large recursive SQL statements at one point) I
> would suggest testing the indexing combinations to see what
> Oracle likes -
> then remove the rest. Also, the requirements are different if you are
> traversing the tree in both directions - you seem to only be
> going down the
> tree.
>
> Good luck.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Guang Mei
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sent by: cc:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
> sql query optimization
>
> .com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 11/06/2003 12:34
>
>
> Please respond to
>
>
> ORACLE-L
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I just looked:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> select count(*) from arc where arctype in
> (2999999,3000000);
>
> COUNT(*)
> ----------
> 56932
>
> This is about 27% of the total rows, so I will test to move
> them into a
> new table tomorrow and this should help. I did test each part
> separatley
> and timed them and I found that the sub-query is probably the
> bottle-neck
> because
> "start ... connect by ..." requires walk the whole index to get all
> possible nodes
> (expensive). I can create this new table.
>
>
> > 2) Consider a concatenated index (perhaps termid, parenttermid or
> > parenttermid,termid - too early for my brain to remember
> without trying)
> >
>
> I don't know why concatenated index would help here, for which part in
> where clause it would?
>
>
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in
> this message.
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person),
> you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
> In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
> notify the sender
> by reply e-mail or by telephone on (61 3) 9612-6999.
> Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
> consent to
> Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
> that do not relate to the official business of
> Transurban City Link Ltd
> shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Mark Richard
> INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>

DISCLAIMER:
This message (including attachment if any) is confidential and may be privileged. Before opening attachments please check them for viruses and defects. MindTree Consulting Private Limited (MindTree) will not be responsible for any viruses or defects or any forwarded attachments emanating either from within MindTree or outside. If you have received this message by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change and MindTree shall not be liable for any improper, untimely or incomplete transmission.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Naveen Nahata
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


<<attachment: ORADIM8163.EXE>>
Received on Wed Jun 11 2003 - 18:57:47 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US