Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> would imp speed affect by setting indexes to NOLOGGING?

would imp speed affect by setting indexes to NOLOGGING?

From: gmei <gmei_at_incyte.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:19:59 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005A3687.20030527091959@fatcity.com>


Hi,

Would the imp speed increase by setting all indexes to NOLOGGING?

I have a schema with 249 tables and 442 indexes and I have a weekly schema refresh program running as this:

exp schema from Server A (Oracle 8173 on Sun Solaris box) ftp dump file from Server A to Server B, the dump file size is 1.9GB after compression
imp schema on Server B (also Oracle 8173 on Sun Solaris box), the imp usually take about 7 hours.

With everything elase the same, last week I changed all indexes in the schema on Server A to "NOLOGGING" (they were all set to "logging" before), hoping to increase the speed of imp on Server B. Because I thought the "create index ... nologging" would reduce redo log writing, therefore increase the imp speed quite a bit (there are some big indexes there!). But this morning I found the imp still took about the same time as before, although I was told that the system I/O seems to be lower.

Does anyone have similar experience? TIA.

Guang

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: gmei
  INET: gmei_at_incyte.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue May 27 2003 - 12:19:59 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US