Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> mbrc (was: buffer cache - once again)

mbrc (was: buffer cache - once again)

From: Boris Dali <boris_dali_at_yahoo.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:36:59 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00597D2D.20030513103659@fatcity.com>


On somewhat related topic (well, not exactly and hence change of the subject line)

I was also playing with Steve's multiblock setting to see how far can I push it/how extent boundaries affect it/how CBO changes its mind with regard to execution plan etc - all the fun stuff (BTW somebody mentioned here that in 9i there's another parameter that compensates for the high multiblock values, so messing with optimizer_index_* is not the only alternative. Does anybody know what it is?)

What I see here is something that I can't seem to find any reasonable explanation for. With mbrc set at 16 it seems to work (according to statistics) twice faster than with mbrc set at 128 (well, actually set at 1000, but "correted" by Oracle to 128). Plans are the same - FTS for both (due to hint or lack of limiting clause).

Environment:
Oracle 9.2.0.2 on Mandrake 9.0 (kernel 2.4)

Tkprof-ed output:
mbrc=16



select /*+ full(t) nocache(t) noparallel(t) */ count(1)
from
 t_source$

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk     
query    current        rows

------- ------ -------- ---------- ----------

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 47

Rows Row Source Operation



      1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=10619 r=10608 w=0 time=503618 us)
 124979 TABLE ACCESS FULL T_SOURCE$ (cr=10619 r=10608 w=0 time=374988 us)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:

  Event waited on                             Times  
Max. Wait Total Waited

mbrc=128



select /*+ full(t) nocache(t) noparallel(t) */ count(1)
from
 t_source$

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk     
query    current        rows

------- ------ -------- ---------- ----------

Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 47

Rows Row Source Operation



      1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=10619 r=10608 w=0 time=993698 us)
 124979 TABLE ACCESS FULL T_SOURCE$ (cr=10619 r=10608 w=0 time=867098 us)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:

  Event waited on                             Times  
Max. Wait Total Waited

Poor man's substitute for Cary's resorce profiler (I am pre-ordering my copy of the book now):

mbrc=16

---
                         Wait Event              
Duration         # Calls         Dur/Call      Wait
Times Max Wait

-----------------------------------
---------------------- ---------------
---------------- --------------- --------
SQL*Net message from client 62.99s 99.0% 3 20.995993s 0 40.13s CPU time 0.51s 0.8% 10620 0.000048s 0 0.00s db file scattered read 0.12s 0.2% 10608 0.000011s 680 0.00s SQL*Net message to client 0.00s 0.0% 3 0.000005s 0 0.00s mbrc=128 --- Wait Event Duration # Calls Dur/Call Wait Times Max Wait
-----------------------------------
---------------------- ---------------
---------------- --------------- --------
SQL*Net message from client 9.52s 85.8% 3 3.174709s 0 4.91s CPU time 1.01s 9.1% 10619 0.000095s 0 0.00s db file scattered read 0.56s 5.1% 10608 0.000053s 99 0.02s SQL*Net message to client 0.00s 0.0% 3 0.000004s 0 0.00s If you've read so far - thank you. I must be missing something obvious here. Can somebody enlighten me? Boris Dali ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Boris Dali INET: boris_dali_at_yahoo.ca Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue May 13 2003 - 13:36:59 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US