Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Opinions request - Oracle on WIN2K vs Unix

RE: Opinions request - Oracle on WIN2K vs Unix

From: Orr, Steve <sorr_at_rightnow.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:48:22 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00589BD5.20030425114822@fatcity.com>


"Linix like TeePee no windows, no gates, Apache inside."

-----Original Message-----
[mailto:Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Yah, Linux does kind of give you the best of both worlds - doesn't it. Stability of Unix, same environment you are used to and cheaper hardware????

Oracle OCP DBA

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>From: "david davis" <ddoralist_at_hotmail.com>
>Darrell,
>The reason we are considering the move is because the CIO said to consider
>it. Last year it was consider moving to SQL Server. Thankfully, I dodged
>that bullet - porting costs were too high
>
>From his level (and he "loves" microsoft) is that the hardware is a lot
>more expensive for the non-Intel Unix servers. Which is somewhat true.

Very true, and in my opinion not really justified unless you're running an 8-way or bigger.

>Though our own internal studies a couple of years ago, was that Unix
>servers were cheaper to manage than Windows servers. Something to do with
>the frequency of problems/reboots/security patches.

That was mostly NT, I run alot of win2k here (plus Mandrake) and it's pretty damn stable if you know what you're doing.

>>From: "Darrell Landrum" <DLANDRUM_at_zalecorp.com>
>>I'm afraid my opinion of moving from HP-UX to windows would get me
>>censored if not kicked off the list.

I like win2k, but I have to agree, *nix is more stable if you have a clue of what's going on.

>> >>> ddoralist_at_hotmail.com 04/24/03 03:41PM >>>
>>We are in the midst of pondering a move from HP Unix (HP/UX) to WIN2K and
>>upgrading Oracle 7.3.4 to 9iR2.

It seems to me that you'd be better off moving to Linux instead of Windows. Less retraining, keep your good uptime, lower hardware costs, what's not to like?

>>I would like opinions from people on the merits or problems with
>>supporting/administering multiple Oracle instances on WIN2K.

Windows fakes it well, but it's not a true multi-tasking system, you'll get lower performance to some extent, although since you'll be able to afford better hardware your speed may actually increase.

Chris Berry
compjma_at_hotmail.com
Systems Administrator
JM Associates

"Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken." -- Duke Leto Atreides

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: sorr_at_rightnow.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Fri Apr 25 2003 - 14:48:22 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US