Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Storage guidelines in 9iR1 ??

Re: Storage guidelines in 9iR1 ??

From: Mogens N?rgaard <mln_at_miracleas.dk>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:15:55 +0100
Message-Id: <24715.322337@fatcity.com>


Go to LMT asap. Whether you want to use uniform sized extents in LMTs or system managed (or whatever it's called) is a matter of dispute. My personal opinion is for uniformed sizing.

Mogens

Prem Khanna J wrote:

>Guys,
>
>The paper "How to stop defragmenting and start living" has
>some SAFE rules for extent management in dictionary
>managed tablespaces (in oracle 8 and 8i) as below:
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Segments smaller than 128M should be placed in 128K extent tablespaces.
>Segments between 128M and 4G should be placed in 4M extent tablespaces.
>Segments larger than 4G should be placed in 128M extent tablespaces
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>In LMT (in 8i),as the paper says,SAFE rules are implemented internally.
>
>does it mean that,i can place objects/segments of any size in LMT in Oracle 9iR1 ?
> OR
>should i go for dictionary managed tablespaces with the above said storage guide lines ?
>
>i am moving my DB from 8.1.6 (with all dictionary managed tablespaces)
>to 9.0.1 (where it is LMT by default).
>In such a case,which is advisable and what would you guys prefer to do ?
>
>Regards,
>Jp.
>
>PS: my version of oracle is 9iR1/win2k.
Received on Wed Mar 19 2003 - 03:15:55 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US