Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Different Backups - A Comparative analysis

Re: Different Backups - A Comparative analysis

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_cybcon.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:39:03 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0052EA20.20030113193903@fatcity.com>

Yes, well, I've heard that claim too.

It may actually work now, but a very capable DBA ( 2 actually ) spent quite a bit of time testing this with no good results.

And then there was the SQL BT glitch that left one of my former coworkers without a certain TBS in the DW for 6 weeks.

Yes, 6 weeks.

And you complain about Oracle Support. ;)

Jared

On Monday 13 January 2003 18:29, Deshpande, Kirti wrote:
> I think SQLBackTrack can get the table data back from the backup file
> without the need to create a partial database on another server and then
> export the table from it.
>
> I remember seeing a demo where a dropped table was recovered by the BMC
> rep.
>
> - Kirti
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:15 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> RMAN Does everything that SQL Backtrack does, for free. :-)
> In fact, last I heard, BMC was planning on altering SQL Backtrack so that
> it
>
> is really nothing more than a nice fancy front end to RMAN. When I was
> at CSX we moved away from SQL Backtrack to RMAN and never had any regrets.
> The only issue with SQL Backtrack vs. RMAN was support for 7.x databases.
> RMAN does not support anything < 8.0.
>
> RF
>
> Robert G. Freeman
> Technical Management Consultant
> TUSC - The Oracle Experts www.tusc.com
> 904.708.5076 Cell (it's everywhere that I am!)
> Author of several books you can find on Amazon.com!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:39 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
>
> I *think* that RMAN does everything SQL Backtrack does.
>
> Can't be positive, as I haven't used it for awhile.
>
> RMAN seems to have everything I recall SQL BT having, and then some.
>
> Jared
>
> On Monday 13 January 2003 12:38, Tim Gorman wrote:
> > Don't know really. Just thought that it should probably be included,
> > then I was hoping to find out... :-)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > To: <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>; "Tim Gorman" <Tim_at_SageLogix.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:49 AM
> >
> > > On Monday 13 January 2003 06:03, Tim Gorman wrote:
> > > > Another question: should SQL BackTrack be included for
> > > > consideration?
> > >
> > > What does SQL BackTrack to that RMAN doesn't do?
> > >
> > > Jared

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: jkstill_at_cybcon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Jan 13 2003 - 21:39:03 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US