Re: Different Backups - A Comparartive analysis

I *think* that RMAN does everything SQL Backtrack does.

Can't be positive, as I haven't used it for awhile.

RMAN seems to have everything I recall SQL BT having, and then some.

Jared

On Monday 13 January 2003 12:38, Tim Gorman wrote:
> Don't know really. Just thought that it should probably be included, then
> I was hoping to find out... :-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>; "Tim Gorman" <Tim_at_SageLogix.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:49 AM
>
> > On Monday 13 January 2003 06:03, Tim Gorman wrote:
> > > Another question: should SQL BackTrack be included for consideration?
> >
> > What does SQL BackTrack to that RMAN doesn't do?
> >
> > Jared

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: jkstill_at_cybcon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).