Re: OT: Guidelines/Standards for supporting non-oracle databases

By all means, try to use SQL Server rather than Access.

SQL Server is much more capable than Access.

If by 'small' you mean 'free database servers', consider PostGreSQL or MySQL.

Jared

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 13:15, Rick_Cale_at_teamhealth.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are virtually an Oracle shop with 2-3 sql server databases due to
> 3rd-party software restrictions.
> We have been asked about supporting other "small" databases such as
> Access,etc within our company. My question is if
> you were asked to support "smaller" databases what
> restrictions/guidelines/standards are worth considering?
> Be kind-constructive answers only :-)
>
> Thanks
> Rick

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: jkstill_at_cybcon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).