Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Do user processes apply against shmmax limit?

Re: Do user processes apply against shmmax limit?

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_cybcon.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 07:34:15 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0050ABFA.20021125073415@fatcity.com>

... and we butt headlong into another fine myth, that is that the SGA must fit into one segment.

On Sunday 24 November 2002 15:53, Richard Ji wrote:
> >if that SGA + user processes > shmmax the system will start swapping.
>
> That's not true. If your SGA is bigger than shmmax, it just means
> the SGA will be fit into multiple shared memory segments. Doesn't
> necessary mean the system will start swapping. Is the scan rate
> going up?
>
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 1:49 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was always under the impression that the only concern with shmmax was
> that it be large enough for the SGA to fit into it. One of my System
> Administrators has just told me that the individual user processes (i.e.,
> the PGA since we're not using multi-threaded server) get added to the SGA
> and if that SGA + user processes > shmmax the system will start swapping.
>
> I haven't found anything to specifically address this issue on Metalink so
> I though I'd throw it open. We've started experiencing system slowdown and
> he says that increasing shmmax could resolve it. I'm skeptical (he also
> suggested increasing SGA to decrease swapping which I told him in no
> uncertain terms was nonsense).
>
> If anyone has a link to a note or white paper I'd appreciate that too.
>
> I've appended his email at the bottom. This slowdown seems to occur even
> when there's virtually on oracle activity so I'm suspecting some other
> cause.
>
> Thanks,
> Jay Miller
>
>
>
>
> nycsun1 and njsun7 has 6 GB of memory and only 2 GB of share memory. This
> morning nycsun1 was very slow and I noticed that there was lots of swaping.
> see vmstst and iostat below in red:
>
> procs memory page disk faults cpu
> r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr s2 s4 s4 sd in sy cs us sy
> id
> 0 0 23 4366736 97528 1 2186 16 12 12 95520 0 0 0 0 0 1104 3330 974 11 8
> 81
> 0 0 23 4365992 96056 1 451 16 24 52 85968 3 0 0 0 0 935 847 416 3 1
> 96
> 0 0 23 4364712 95512 2 310 36 24 492 85968 68 0 0 0 0 1036 2183 670 13 4
> 84
> 0 0 23 4361568 95488 9 2264 0 76 964 95520 136 0 0 0 0 979 4065 607 12 6
> 82
> 0 0 23 4362384 96080 1 6 4 8 8 77376 0 0 0 0 0 975 465 457 2 1
> 97
> 0 0 23 4361944 95712 4 730 92 48 532 95520 64 0 0 0 0 1040 1859 734 8 3
> 89
> 0 0 23 4360424 95480 4 41 36 40 100 77376 7 0 0 0 0 986 1250 542 6 0
> 94
> 0 0 23 4361304 96096 3 264 76 36 88 88496 7 0 0 0 0 1037 942 665 5 3
> 92
> 0 0 23 4359680 95784 2 449 4 28 84 95520 8 0 0 0 0 922 1047 374 4 1
> 95
> 0 0 23 4359936 95464 2 544 4 20 332 95520 44 0 0 0 0 931 1095 384 2 2
> 96
>
> /s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c2t6d0
> 0.0 34.5 0.0 270.0 0.2 13.8 6.7 399.5 6 44 c5t12d0 -- swap
> disk
> 0.0 34.5 0.0 270.0 0.5 10.7 15.5 309.4 18 39 c5t13d0 -- swap
> disk
>
>
> This shows that the system is not effectively using memory. I suggest
> increasing the share memory to 4 GB so that DBAs can increase their memory
> usage. Also set priority paging on. Priority paging will give application
> first priority then free memory will be allocated to file cache( Solaris
> 2.6 and 7. Solaris 8 is set dynamically).
>
> * ORACLE CONFIGS
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax =2048000000 -- increase to 4096000000
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=300
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=30
> set semsys:seminfo_semmap=500
> set semsys:seminfo_semmni=200
> set semsys:seminfo_semmns=2000
> set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=1000
> set semsys:seminfo_semmnu=500
> set semsys:seminfo_semume=150

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: jkstill_at_cybcon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Nov 25 2002 - 09:34:15 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US