Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Dbf Files, Mount Points and Oracle 7

RE: Dbf Files, Mount Points and Oracle 7

From: Whittle Jerome Contr NCI <Jerome.Whittle_at_scott.af.mil>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 12:11:45 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004FA42A.20021101121145@fatcity.com>


Wayne,

Why in the heck are you worried about tables having multiple extents? The old 'table in one big initial extent' rule died a long time ago. Please read Bhaskar Himatsingka's paper "How to Stop Defragmenting and Start Living: The Definitive Word on Fragmentation"

http://www.dbatoolbox.com/WP2001/spacemgmt/defrag.htm

Would an old USAF crew chief lead a Navy guy wrong?

Jerry Whittle
ACIFICS DBA
NCI Information Systems Inc.
jerome.whittle_at_scott.af.mil
618-622-4145

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McGill Wayne China Lake CA
>
> I am part-time DBA for an Oracle system that for reasons
> beyond our control is frozen at 7.3.4, at least for the
> immediate future. I am having some problems and I think
> I know how to correct them but I am asking the old-timers
> to dust off their brains to tell me if my proposals are
> O.K.
>
> It started when I noticed that one of the tables had gone
> into 2 extents. Normally when this happens, I (in a nutshell),
> make a copy of the table with larger storage parameters.
> But for this table, I get the following error message:
>
> ORA-01658: unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
> in tablespace ORA_DATA1
>
> I also noticed that this system has 3 mount points. When I
> look at the capacity of the disks, the first is always
> 89 percent full and the other two are 1 percent. This is
> because all the DBF files for tablespaces were created on
> the first mount point. So all the other two have are small
> control and redo-log files.
>
> So what I would like to do to fix all of this is to move
> some of the tablespaces onto the other 2 mount points. I
> would also like to create a couple of new tablespaces, one
> to store two large application-related tables and another
> to store a large table that gets dropped and recreated
> everyday (a local copy of data from an external system).
>
> So my questions are:
> 1) Is there any reason to keep all the tablespaces on one
> mount point?
> 2) I know about keeping table data and indexes in different
> tablespaces but can they also be on different mount points?
> 3) Any reason for not putting my 1 large temp-table into its
> own tablespace?
> 4) If I can do all of this, will anything significantly change
> in Oracle 8, 9, 10, ...?
>
> I have read different manuals and references but I have not
> seen anything that indicates that I cannot do what I am proposing.
> I have tried this solution on a test 8.1.6 database and everything
> seems to be working.
>
> TIA, Wayne
> McGillWL_at_naviar.navy.mil
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Whittle Jerome Contr NCI
  INET: Jerome.Whittle_at_scott.af.mil

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:11:45 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US