Re: OPS Sequences: nocache == order ??

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 09:53, Tim Gorman wrote:
> Thinking more about it last night...
>
> Since Oracle's theoretical limit is 16384 commits per second, I imagine
> that you could safely make the sequence recycle at 9999 (or 16384 or 99999)
> and limit the number of digits contributed by the sequence to 4-5...
>

Really? What have they done in the past to get those astronomical TPS numbers on some of their bencmarks?

I'm pretty sure they were in excess of that number.

IIRC, they were done on an nCube using OPS and about 400 CPUs.

Jared

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: jkstill_at_cybcon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).