Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Inserts are taking time !

Re: Inserts are taking time !

From: Marul Mehta <marul_at_zycus.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:28:22 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004C9830.20020906002822@fatcity.com>


Thanks Justin,

Now its high time and I have to take some harsh steps to resolve this bottleneck. This might even go to an extent of changing the app code. But I have to do it, there is no way out.

Thank you all for the support. I will get back to you with my reading and implementation in a day or two (even if this is successful or not).

bfn
Marul.

> At 09:08 AM 9/5/2002, you wrote:
> >Thanks a lot for the response,
> >No its not a batch insert; each insert is done with auto-commit=true from
> >the java application. So, after each insert a commit is done at the Db
> >level, which is the root cause of such a delay, I guess.
>
> Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. I'm willing to wager that 90% of your
time
> is spent waiting for the commits in this scenario.
>
> >But if this auto-commit is the issue than why first 10K records are
inserted
> >quickly.
>
> Well, it's only slower by a factor of 6 when you go from 0 rows to 350,000
> rows, which seems reasonable. When you have 0 rows in the database, you
> probably have the table, indexes, etc. completely cached in memory. When
> the table grows larger, however, more and more "stuff" will be coming from
> the disk.
>
> Additionally, the commits are likely to be a bit more complicated the more
> rows you have, because the number of blocks that need to be touched in the
> indexes will go up.
>
>
> >I cannot disable constraints even for a sinlge second as there will be
heavy
> >reads going on even when inserts are taking place.
>
> Can you do batch inserts, so that you're not committing 10,000
> times? Modify the application to batch 1000 statements at a time, and
I'll
> be you get much happier very quickly.
>
>
>
> >Any clues?
> >
> >TAI
> >Marul.
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
> >Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:53 PM
> >
> >
> > > Marul,
> > >
> > > I think this question needs to be answered, otherwise impossible to
make
> > > suggestions...
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > Sent: 05 September 2002 08:18
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > >
> > >
> > > Marul, what i fail to understand is:
> > >
> > > Are you running a batch job of inserting 350,000 inserts?
> > >
> > > If that is the case then you should go for dropping and recreating the
> > > indexes. Can you partition the table and use local partitioned
indexes?
> > >
> > > Can't you try the option of inserting in parallel?
> > >
> > > Did you try disabling the constraints and then ENABLE NOVALIDATE
them(that
> > > will only work if you r sure of the data)?
> > >
> > > Naveen
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:48 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks Chris,
> > > So than any clues how to resolve this issue, as earliest, becuase this
is
> > > causing bottleneck in our application .
> > >
> > > Rgds,
> > > Marul.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:29 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > > Good question, Jared! Perhaps 'overflow' is technically not the
> >correct
> > > > term to use to decribe this scenario but it seemed to fit the bill
> > > > sufficiently to mail off a quick one-liner solution without going
into
> > > great
> > > > depth. Some of us have work to do, you know ;)
> > > >
> > > > To redeem myself I probably should have mentioned that this table
> >sounds
> > > > pretty volatile. Consequently the index(es) are likely to end up
fairly
> > > > disorganized, especially if the 350k records are being inserted in
> > > > ascending order. Once you start adding levels to the index things
> >start
> > > to
> > > > slow down....
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > Sent: 04 September 2002 16:50
> > > > To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com; chris.w.johnson_at_bt.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday 04 September 2002 04:23, chris.w.johnson_at_bt.com wrote:
> > > > > It sounds to me like the indexes are going into overflow - this
will
> > > cause
> > > >
> > > > What do you mean by 'overflow'?
> > > >
> > > > Jared
> > > >
> > > > > the insert time to increase. I would suggest batching up the
inserts,
> > > > > dropping the indexes, running the inserts and re-creating the
> >indexes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > Sent: 04 September 2002 07:53
> > > > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a table which can contain more than half a million
records.
> >When
> > > > we
> > > > > try to insert some 10k records in the empty table it get inserted
in
> >10
> > > > > min. but as the size increases time taken to insert also
increases.
> > > After
> > > > > 350,000 records it takes around an hour to insert 10k records.
> > > > > There are around 15 columns in it out of which 11 are indexed.
There
> >is
> > > > one
> > > > > concatenated function-based index on two columns of Varchar type
and
> >two
> > > > > separate index for the same two columns.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have checked the free space for the tablespaces to which the
table
> >and
> > > > > indexes are attached to. They are in two separate tbs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any clues why this is happenning.
> > > > >
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Marul.
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------
> > > > Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Attachment: 1"
> > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > > Content-Description:
> > > > ----------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > > > --
> > > > Author:
> > > > INET: chris.w.johnson_at_bt.com
> > > >
> > > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > > > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > > > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > > > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > > > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> > > > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > > --
> > > Author: Marul Mehta
> > > INET: marul_at_zycus.com
> > >
> > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> > > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> > > --
> > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > > --
> > > Author: Naveen Nahata
> > > INET: naveen_nahata_at_mindtree.com
> > >
> > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> > > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> > > --
> > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > > --
> > > Author:
> > > INET: chris.w.johnson_at_bt.com
> > >
> > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> > > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> >--
> >Author: Marul Mehta
> > INET: marul_at_zycus.com
> >
> >Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> >San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> >to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> >the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> >(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> >also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>
> Justin Cave
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Justin Cave
> INET: jcave_at_cableone.net
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Marul Mehta
  INET: marul_at_zycus.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Fri Sep 06 2002 - 03:28:22 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US