Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: High %wio on AIX O.S. DB Server after Oracle 8i Migration

RE: High %wio on AIX O.S. DB Server after Oracle 8i Migration

From: VIVEK_SHARMA <VIVEK_SHARMA_at_infosys.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 23:38:19 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00497974.20020714233819@fatcity.com>

maxservers Already to a High Value i.e. 400 as can be seen below . %wio nevertheless Continues to be about 40-45%

After applying the patch 8.1.7.4 , I shall Let you folks know about the %wio Figure

NOTE - cpu_count = 18

Async_io:

lsattr -E -l aio0


minservers 10        MINIMUM number of servers                True
maxservers 400       MAXIMUM number of servers                True
maxreqs    16384     Maximum number of REQUESTS               True
kprocprio  39        Server PRIORITY                          True
autoconfig available STATE to be configured at system restart True
fastpath   enable    State of fast path                       True


Paging Daemon :

maxperm=40.0% of real memory
minperm=20.0% of real memory

Thanks indeed though for the advice

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 7:38 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

"The fsync() blocks the process until all the dirty pages are written to the physical disks" - maybe this is a problem with async i/o ?

How many async i/o servers are configured on the AIX box (use "smitty aio" to check). As a start point set to the maximum to Number of CPU's * 10 and set the min to half the max.

Just a thought...

Ade

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:49 PM
To: LazyDBA.com Discussion

After migration from Oracle ver 7.3.4 to 8.1.7.2 (32-bit) , %wio (%iowait) on Database Machine Exceedingly High i.e. about 60 % . NOTE - This is a Live Production Site .

AIX 4.3.3
Storage Box = SSA Class Storage (7133-D40 Model) Machine S85 P-Series
Application - Banking (Hybrid)

SAMPLE Output Below %iowait = 60.5 % - (Detailed Output file Attached )

tty: tin tout avg-cpu: % user % sys % idle % iowait

          1.2 10.0 8.9 21.8 8.9 60.5

Disks:        % tm_act     Kbps      tps    Kb_read   Kb_wrtn
hdisk0           0.7       4.0       0.8          0       240
hdisk1           1.1       5.8       1.0         12       336
hdisk3           0.0       0.0       0.0          0         0
hdisk9           0.0       0.0       0.0          0         0
hdisk6           0.0       0.0       0.0          0         0
hdisk2           1.0       4.0       0.8          0       240
hdisk4           0.0       0.0       0.0          0         0
hdisk5           0.0       0.0       0.0          0         0
hdisk11         80.4     449.1      66.6      22292      4656
hdisk7          91.0     964.4     145.9      37868     19996
hdisk10         65.5     491.5      78.4      22916      6576
hdisk13         95.5     914.3     127.2      25656     29200
hdisk14         93.5     869.1     129.5      22824     29320
hdisk15         97.9     960.8     152.6      35620     22028
hdisk16         98.4     1382.8     174.7      53112     29856
hdisk8          75.0     802.9     119.4      40816      7360
cd0              0.0       0.0       0.0          0         0

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMENTS of Hardware Engineer :-

>From the perfpmr data collected on July 5th and it has
been analysed by our Labs.
The performance degradation is caused by fsync() routines called by Oracle processes.
In 5 secs trace, fsync was called 276 times and consumed 21.39% CPU system time.
The fsync() blocks the process until all the dirty pages are written to the physical disks.
We checked the old perfpmr data collected with Oracle 7.3.4.5, it doesn't have this issue.
Oracle has a fix to address the fsync problem on 8.1.7.2 (64-Bit) & 8.1.7.4
(32-Bit).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

WE HAVE INITIATED WITH ORACLE CORP FOR A PATCH ON 8.1.7.2 32-BIT. Nevertheless Any Other Ideas just in case the Patch Does NOT bring Down the %wio
Enough ?

NOTE - High %wio has been Observed only on AIX O.S. (NOT Other O.S.) post migration
to Oracle 8.1.7.2

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: VIVEK_SHARMA
  INET: VIVEK_SHARMA_at_infosys.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Jul 15 2002 - 02:38:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US