RE: HP-UX 11.0/8.1.6.2.0/Optimizer

On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, John Kanagaraj wrote:

> Contrary to common understanding, the Cost based optimizer is 'forced' in
> certain situations even if the mode is RULE. Examples are: Use of hints
> other than RULE, Partitioned tables and indexes, Index-organized tables,
> Reverse key indexes, Function-based indexes, SAMPLE clauses in a SELECT
> statement, Parallel execution and parallel DML (i.e. presence of DEGREE on
> Tables/Indexes), etc. Was this the case? This was the focus of my paper at
> IOUG...
My mouth dropped open when I read this. News to me. This is a bit astonishing, though I'm sure well documented. Somehow I've passed over it. John, can you send a link to your paper?

THanks,
Sean

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: sean.hull_at_pobox.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).