RE: set sort_area_size, sort_retained_size,hash_area_size but sti

From: Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY) <Bruce.Reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:03:20 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0047DA45.20020613170320@fatcity.com>

Paula,

and what OS / database version?

eg if Windows is the server setup to use all 16 Gb of memory?

Bruce Reardon

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, 14 June 2002 2:29

Paula,

what is the size of your hash_area_size, sort_area_size, and sort_area_retained_size?

what does your explain plan look like? hashes, sort/merge, or nested loops?

do you have a lot of parallel to parallel, parallel to serial in your plans?

jack silvey

• Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us wrote:
  > Have 12Gb RAM available , using parallel query with
  > large mv joined to small
  > code tables and setting session parameters to use
  > Gb's of memory (have
  > system to myself at the time) but system shows 12Gb
  > RAM available still and
  > writing to temporary segment - why or why or why?
  -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY) INET: Bruce.Reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu Jun 13 2002 - 20:03:20 CDT