Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: MySQL versus Oracle

RE: MySQL versus Oracle

From: Orr, Steve <sorr_at_rightnow.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:14:55 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00471A82.20020531151455@fatcity.com>


> MySQL doesn't claim to be ACID

Here's a quote from the 4.0 manual about current features: "The table handler InnoDB is now offered as a feature of the standard MySQL server, including full support for transactions and row-level locking."

InnoDB is also available starting with version 3.23.5.

Here's a quote regarding future 4.1 features: "Mission-critical, heavy-load users of MySQL will appreciate the additions to our replication system and our online hot backup. Later versions of 4.0 will include fail-safe replication; already in existing 4.0.0, the LOAD DATA FROM MASTER command will soon automate slave setup. The online backup will make it easy to add a new replication slave without taking down the master, and have a very low performance penalty on update-heavy systems."

Mene, mene, tekel, ufarsin... (?)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

> If there's only one user accessing it, yes.
>
> --Walt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:44 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> a) It's blindingly fast as a single user database, faster then oracle.
>
> Really? Even with a 30 million record table?

Depends on what they are doing. MySQL doesn't claim to be ACID, just fast. If multiple users are reading a table that isn't configured for locks then it could be faster than Oracle. The overhead and complexity introducted into Oracle by rollback handling is a major slowdown for anythng the database does.

This is mainly a matter of applying a tool in the way it was designed to be used. MySQL is intended for primarily readaccess  databases or smaller ones where the less granular locking is not so much of a problem.

--
Steven Lembark                              2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                      Chicago, IL 60647
                                           +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: sorr_at_rightnow.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 18:14:55 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US