Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Waits 8i vs. 9i??

RE: Waits 8i vs. 9i??

From: Deshpande, Kirti <kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:33:47 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00462ABC.20020516103347@fatcity.com>


Not exactly. The granularity of capturing times increased in 9i, but as Gopal implied, there are just a lot more wait events in 9i as compared to the previous releases.

Check this link out to see what new events were introduced in 9i : http://www.oraperf.com/reference.html and click on Wait Events by Version.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Isn't that something to do with 9i being able to report wait times in nanoseconds instead of (milliseconds? or microseconds?) in previous versions ??

Raj



Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Internal code changes= additional features=fine grained (event) reporting?

Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
Bangalore, INDIA
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Deshpande, Kirti
  INET: kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu May 16 2002 - 13:33:47 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US