Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: single clustered tables

RE: single clustered tables

From: <Scott.Shafer_at_dcpds.cpms.osd.mil>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:40:27 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0044FDE5.20020425124027@fatcity.com>

        Objection 1) Most Oracle docs recommend: don't store data in clusters

        if it's going to be updated frequently. Updating clustered tables is bad.

If its being updated, its not a true data warehouse.

Scott Shafer
San Antonio, TX
210-581-6217

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Becker [SMTP:beckerb_at_mfldclin.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: single clustered tables
>
> Hello,
>
> Env: Oracle 8.1.6 on Solaris 2.7
>
> Someone has suggested the following idea, and I'm wondering
> if this is good/bad. Any comments, pro or con, are appreciated.
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: Scott.Shafer_at_dcpds.cpms.osd.mil

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Apr 25 2002 - 15:40:27 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US