Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Clash of the DBs in eWeek

Re: Clash of the DBs in eWeek

From: Henrik Ekenberg <henrik.ekenberg_at_anoto.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 22:18:21 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0041F231.20020304221821@fatcity.com>


Hi,

I have also an other question.
Do you you why they did not test postgressql ?

Regards
Henrik

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


E-mail :henrik.ekenberg_at_anoto.com



On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jesse, Rich wrote:


-!-Anybody happen to see the cover story on the 02/25/2002 iss of eWeek titled
-!-"Database Clash"?
-!-
-!-The pretty graphs say that their tests showed that Oracle and MySQL rocked
-!-the other DBs they tested (including MS SQueaL Server). So I investigated.
-!-I went to http://www.eweek.com/ and downloaded the "Online Exclusive:
-!-Download our configuration and tuning scripts".
-!-
-!-According to the Oracle setup docs in there, they're NOT using MTS and
-!-processes in init.ora is 150. So then how did they test for 1000
-!-"concurrent Web clients"?
-!-
-!-Anyone have a thought?
-!-
-!-
-!-Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
-!-Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
-!-
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Henrik Ekenber INET: henrik.ekenberg_at_anoto.com>" <henrike_at_anoto.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue Mar 05 2002 - 00:18:21 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US