Re: Performance issues

Is it so necessary to have table with 100 Mil. records? Now way how to break data into more tables?

Jan Pruner

On Fri 8. February 2002 05:53, you wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are developing a system in which some tables in the database might be
> having about 100 Million records. We are planning to use table and index
> partition's as a means to improve performance. Could you please share
> your experiences/views about handling such huge tables. Is this
> partitioning sufficient or do we have to look in to some other means.
>
> It would also be of great help if you could provide me some pointers to
> documents which gives some insight for handling such tables and
> databases.
>
> thanks in advance,
> Sathish.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: jan_at_pruner.cz

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).