RE: AW: auditing tables

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:17:54 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003FEBA2.20020129075523@fatcity.com>

Jared,

I just put the old values in the audit table with an additional column which tells exactly which columns are changed. Ah the wonders of dynamic sql ...

Raj

---

Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:06 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Rachel,

I don't think you need two rows for updates. The old values will be in the audit table, the new ones are in the production table. At least that's the way I've always done it. Is there some other reason for saving both in the audit table?

Jared

*********************************************************************2

This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.

*********************************************************************2
Received on Tue Jan 29 2002 - 10:17:54 CST