Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> SQL BackTrack 3.3

SQL BackTrack 3.3

From: Tracy Rahmlow <Tracy.Rahmlow_at_aexp.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:54:49 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003FAA21.20020124145028@fatcity.com>

We are currently using the noincremental option within Sql BackTrack and considering the enabling of it. Has anybody gone through the process? Were there any issues and did you notice reduced space usage as well as faster backup times? Any reasons why you would not enable the incremental backup option? (I realize it does matter how many blocks are updated)

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Tracy Rahmlow
  INET: Tracy.Rahmlow_at_aexp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu Jan 24 2002 - 17:54:49 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US