RE: Using procedures instead of coding update/insert

From: Gogala, Mladen <MGogala_at_oxhp.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:54:36 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003F02BB.20020115084025@fatcity.com>

The reason for that is the fact that with prepared statements you can do array binds while that isn't possible with the stored procedures. I don't like this kind of comparisons. I judge on case by case basis.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:55 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

We have done some preliminary testing and found prepared statements about 20% faster than stored procedures. We inserted 200,000 records at a time (28-50 columns in a table ) using stored procedures and then used prepared statements for the same dataset. Both of them were called from java using JDBC thin drivers and interestingly found prepared statements faster. Similarly, deletes were also about 15%-20% faster using prepared statements. For some reasons, updates to the same tables gave almost identical performance.

Rakesh

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Rakesh Gupta
INET: GuptaR_at_telecomsys.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Gogala, Mladen
INET: MGogala_at_oxhp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------