Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RE: Has anyone heard of "Mirror Accessible"?

RE: RE: Has anyone heard of "Mirror Accessible"?

From: Ron Thomas <rthomas_at_hypercom.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:08:04 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003D6331.20011205155021@fatcity.com>

You guys will get no sympathy from me.

We have an Apps 11.5 implementation going live on Jan 1. In Brazil no less. And of course the PHBs
want this to interface with our local 10.7 installation.

BTW, Anybody speak Porteguese?

Ron Thomas
Hypercom, Inc
rthomas_at_hypercom.com

                                                                                       
                  
                    shermanej_at_ecc                                                      
                  
                    ic.com               To:     ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com                  
                  
                    Sent by:             cc:                                           
                  
                    root_at_fatcity.        Subject:     RE: RE: Has anyone heard of 
"Mirror Accessible"?   
                    com                                                                
                  
                                                                                       
                  
                                                                                       
                  
                    12/05/01                                                           
                  
                    04:25 PM                                                           
                  
                    Please                                                             
                  
                    respond to                                                         
                  
                    ORACLE-L                                                           
                  
                                                                                       
                  
                                                                                       
                  




Same here!

I have an HP-UX upgrade and an Oracle upgrade over the holidays. It's been on the queue for more than a year.

bye-bye Oracle 7.3.4 .... Woo Hoo!!!!

     __   _                 =================================
 -o)/ /  (_)__  __ ____  __ | Ed Sherman                    |
 /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | Oracle Certified Professional |
_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | ECC International Corporation |
                            | Tel: (407) 859-7410 x2708     |
                            =================================
Supporter of the coalition for grumpiness where grumpiness is due

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:25 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Ain't being a DBA glamorous???

Me, I'm just in it because I heard that DBA's get all the chicks :)

Believe me, I feel your pain. I have more Oracle 7.3.4 databases here to upgrade than I can say without embarassment. That's what I get for being the new hire. :)

A fellow DBA,
Scott Lockhart
Oracle DBA
I-Link, Ltd.
Draper, UT

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: sdlockhart_at_bigplanet.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


* * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * *
The information in this email is subject to the record protection mandated
by 5 United States Code 552(b)(4) and relevant judicial opinions.
(See attached file: attd84ij.dat)




=?iso-8859-1?Q?attd84ij.dat?=
Description: Binary data


Received on Wed Dec 05 2001 - 18:08:04 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US