Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: perplexing plan?

RE: perplexing plan?

From: Daemen, Remco <R.Daemen_at_facent.nl>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 08:46:20 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.003A3782.20011005082021@fatcity.com>

Doug,

Sorting is caused by the "distinct", and is probably the cause of your performance problem. Try to limit the sorting to a minimal number of rows, e.g. by creating a temp table containing all (including the multiple copies) rows and then select the distinct values of that table. You could also try : select distinct * from (select ......) to replace the select distinct.

Another tip: don't you hints unless you really have to ...

HTH, Remco

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----

Van: Doug C [mailto:dcowles_at_i84.net]
Verzonden: vrijdag 5 oktober 2001 16:30
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: perplexing plan?

I'm a little perplexed by this query and it's associated plan. It's also a big
performance problem. The problem is the 35 million row table clearly. But looking at the plan at the bottom, I'm not sure where the sorting is going on.
Would anyone say the index full scan on the 35 million row table is being sorted? Or does it look more like it's being fed to a nested loops query?

Thanks,
Doug

SELECT /*+ ORDERED INDEX(S_ S15_IX1) INDEX(BUS_FID F15_UK1) INDEX(STREET A15_IX1) */ SDE.STREET.CFCC, SDE.STREET.BUS_FID ,S_.eminx,S_.eminy,   S_.emaxx,S_.emaxy, BUS_FID.fid,BUS_FID.numofpts,BUS_FID.entity,   BUS_FID.points,BUS_FID.rowid
FROM
 (SELECT /*+ INDEX(SP_ S15_IX1) */ DISTINCT sp_fid,eminx,eminy,emaxx,emaxy   FROM SDE.S15 SP_ WHERE SP_.gx >= :1 AND SP_.gx <= :2 AND SP_.gy >= :3   AND SP_.gy <= :4 AND SP_.eminx <= :5 AND SP_.eminy <= :6 AND SP_.emaxx >= :7
  AND SP_.emaxy >= :8) S_
, SDE.STREET
 , SDE.F15 BUS_FID
WHERE S_.sp_fid = BUS_FID.fid
AND S_.sp_fid = SDE.STREET.BUS_FID

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------



Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 45 473.15 475.04 223532 66153503 0 4494
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------


total 47 473.15 475.04 223532 66153503 0 4494

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 20

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------

   4494 HASH JOIN
   4494 NESTED LOOPS

   4495      VIEW
   4495         SORT UNIQUE
   4817           INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 7356)
   4494      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID STREET
   8988            INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 7355)
33065402  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID F15
33065403        INDEX FULL SCAN (object id 7283)
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Doug C
  INET: dcowles_at_i84.net

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Daemen, Remco INET: R.Daemen_at_facent.nl Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Fri Oct 05 2001 - 10:46:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US