Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Alternatives to roles in procedures?

RE: Alternatives to roles in procedures?

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:34:27 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.00391758.20010918074622@fatcity.com>

Surely, my good man, you jest! I'm just happy that I convinced peoples that "SELECT ANY TABLE", "DELETE ANY TABLE", etc were BAD for app accounts. That's why I need to do all the GRANTs.

Waiting for that first accidental drop of a SYS object...

Rich Jesse                          System/Database Administrator
Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com             Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA


-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 15:52
To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
Cc: Jesse, Rich

Short answer: No

When using procedures to allow access to a schema, you really should consider using 3 schemas, not 2.

The C schema gets execute access to the procs in Schema B. No users will have access to the tables this way.

Jared
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue Sep 18 2001 - 15:34:27 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US