Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Extent size for system tablespace

RE: Extent size for system tablespace

From: Vergara, Michael (TEM) <mvergara_at_guidant.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:22:26 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0034039A.20010703091119@fatcity.com>

<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>Hi All...
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001> 
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>I need to add my 2-cent's worth to this thread.  At the 8i (8.1.5) level,
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>we noticed that some SYSTEM tables were throwing lots (really...LOTS) of
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>extents.  I know..I know...lots of extents aren't necessarily a bad thing.
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>But when I look at the SYSTEM tablespace and see objects with 2,000-3,000
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>extents I just can't stand it!
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001> 
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>So, we stepped back and through trial and error (and this is a secret!
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>Don't tell Oracle!) we modified SQL.BSQ.  Now our 8i databases all look
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>'normal'.  Yes, they still add extents, but now the NEXTEXTENT size is
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>larger so I get fewer extents even with PCTINCREASE 0.
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001> 
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>I figure what we've done here would <FONT color=#0000ff face="Courier New" size=2>not necessarily work the same for
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>some of the places I've worked before because the application <FONT color=#0000ff face="Courier New" size=2>mix is
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>different.  <FONT color=#0000ff face="Courier New" size=2>Hey...it works for us.  Build a
sandbox.  Try it.  YMMV.
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001> 
<SPAN

class=882210316-03072001>Mike
 

---

<FONT color=#0000ff face="Courier New"
size=2>=========================================================================== Michael P. Vergara              | I&#8217;ve got a PBS mind in an MTV world Oracle DBA                      | Guidant Corporation             | <FONT face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Koivu, Lisa [mailto:lisa.koivu_at_efairfield.com]Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:12 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Extent size for system tablespace Justin, Do not change the way Oracle sets up the system tablespace.  Let it do it's thing.  I have never had a problem with it other than to resize next extents for certain objects from time to time, but that's rare. HTH <FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Lisa Koivu <FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Extreeeeeemely Bored Janitor (aka dba) <FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Ft. Lauderdale, FL, US -----Original Message----- <FONT face=Arial size=1>From:   <FONT face=Arial size=1>Justin Coleman [SMTP:jd_coleman_ora1_at_hotmail.com] <FONT face=Arial size=1>Sent:   <FONT face=Arial size=1>Tuesday, July 03, 2001 11:51 AM <FONT face=Arial size=1>To:     <FONT face=Arial size=1>Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <FONT face=Arial size=1>Subject:        <FONT face=Arial size=1>Extent size for system tablespace Experts, From an earlier e-mail, I found out that LMT was not possible with the SYSTEM tablespace.  Thanks for that info.  So if using Data Dictionary managed tablespaces for the SYSTEM tablespace, when setting up a new <FONT face=Arial size=2>database, should you change the default extent size for the system space and change pctincrease from 50% down to 0%? Cheers for any help in advance. <FONT face=Arial size=2>Justin
Received on Tue Jul 03 2001 - 11:22:26 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US