Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Fwd:Re: Update: Appeals court judges take Jackson to task

Fwd:Re: Update: Appeals court judges take Jackson to task

From: <dgoulet_at_vicr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:05:23 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0033C560.20010628111202@fatcity.com>


For those of you interested in the fortunes of MicroSlop, it would appear that politics has done it again!!

____________________Forward Header_____________________
t
Author: "Sharon Machlis" <Sharon_Machlis_at_computerworld.com> Date: 6/28/2001 1:21 PM

Thanks for writing to us in the past about the Microsoft antitrust trial. Because of your previous e-mail, we wanted to let you know that:

A U.S. Appeals Court has just overturned Judge Jackson's order to break up Microsoft Corp.

You can read our bulletin at

http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO61733,00.html

and then post your opinion on our interactive forum at

http://cwforums.computerworld.com/WebX?50@@.ee9a4d9/0

(Note: Anyone can read messages; free registration is required to post. If you're not registered yet, head to http://cwforums.computerworld.com/webX?18@@ )

Regards,

Sharon Machlis
Online Managing Editor
Computerworld
http://www.computerworld.com
500 Old Connecticut Path
Framingham, MA 01701
USA
Phone: +1 508 820 8231
Fax: +1 508 875 8931
E-mail: sharon_machlis_at_computerworld.com

Dick Goulet <dgoulet_at_vicr.com> on 02/28/2001 09:29:00 AM

Please respond by 02/28/2001

To: editor_at_computerworld.com, letters_at_computerworld.com cc: (bcc: cweditor)

  |  Patrick

      Thibodeau   |  58125

Was Judge Jackson a little too open about his feelings on MicroSoft, yup he sure was. Does that mean that his ruling was biased, on the whole no. After what MicroSoft has done to the software and in particular the PC operating system market they are clearly a monopoly & should be disassembled. One only has to look at the demise/misfortune of OS/2, Lattice C, Apple, Netscape, Digital Research, and others to see the light. The only thing in Judge Jackson's ruling that I see as wrong is that he only required them to split. It should have been a 3 or 4 way break up.


Received on Thu Jun 28 2001 - 13:05:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US