Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Design Question - Thoughts Needed

RE: Design Question - Thoughts Needed

From: Toepke, Kevin M <ktoepke_at_cms.cendant.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:30:37 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.00336E44.20010625104144@fatcity.com>

Tracy:

I'd make the coverages their own entity. And use a cross-reference table to determine if a specific coverage is available in given state. This stuff needs to be entity driven because it is so dynamic (who knows, your company may stop offering coverage in, say New Jersey.)

As for I/Os, I wouldn't worry about them too much. These tables are probably small enought that you could cache them (ALTER TABLE ... CACHE) to virtually eliminate physical I/Os.

As for when you draw the line, if you have 1 or 2 and the number is not likely to change in the near future, then store them in the parent entity (e.g., phone numbers). If the number gets much higher or is a highly variable, then store in a separate entity.

Kevin T

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

We are looking to redesign our current system and a question popped up that I
am struggling with. (our business is auto insurance). Each vehicle on a policy may have 1 or many coverages. For example, comprehensive, collision,
towing, property damage ... A couple of things: 1- some coverages will not apply because they are state specific. 2 - some coverages will not be chosen
by the insured. Therefore, should I have a vehicle table with each coverage and its premium as separate specific columns or should I add a coverage table
which will contain the coverage and premium. Under the later example if I have
10 coverages and I want to print them on the insured's declaration page don't I
have a possible performance problem with up to 10 i/os. Where as with the first example I only have 1 read but possible space wastage. I know in 1st normal form you should remove repeating groups, in my case is a coverage a repeating group? Where do you draw the line? For example, clients may have
multiple phone numbers although I don't see many examples where the phone numbers are split into another table. Please share any thoughts that may make
my decision easier. Thanks

Just an fyi, in our current design the coverages have been stored with the vehicle.

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Tracy Rahmlow
  INET: Tracy.Rahmlow_at_aexp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Toepke, Kevin M
  INET: ktoepke_at_cms.cendant.com
Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Mon Jun 25 2001 - 12:30:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US