Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: exp performance question ( direct=y)

RE: exp performance question ( direct=y)

From: Mohan, Ross <MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:05:20 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0033455E.20010622130606@fatcity.com>

I'd set recordlength to 128 or
64K, depending on your OS....just a read stride...

  -----Original
  Message-----From: Jim Conboy
  [mailto:Jim.Conboy_at_trw.com]Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:28   PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:   exp performance question ( direct=y)
  No, buffer is ignored for
  DIRECT=Y.  But RECORDLENGTH should be set to DB_BLOCK_SIZE, or a multiple   of it.  I've had dramatic gains in performance doing this.    
  Also, pre-8i you couldn't do
  direct-mode export of LONG fields.  As of sometime in 8i you can (I know   it works in 8.1.7).
   
  Jim
>>> MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com 06/22/01 04:00PM
>>>

  I dunno. Does the BUFFER
  still matter when DIRECT=Y?
   
  If so, I either remove it
  entirely, or multiply it by about a factor of five or so.    
  my $0.02   

    <FONT face=Tahoma
    size=2>-----Original Message-----From: JOE TESTA     [mailto:JTESTA_at_longaberger.com]Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:43     PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re:     exp performance question ( direct=y)     Ron,
     
    ok i'm now confused,
     
    exp direct=n|y
    imp no such option
    sql_loader has direct also.
     
    or am i missing something here?
     
    joe
     
    >>> RROGERS_at_galottery.org 06/22/01 03:00PM     >>>I thought that DIRECT=Y was for imports only. It makes since     because in the import you are placing the data directly into the blocks with     out a redo log.I have no idea why there was a difference in the times     unless it was the extra overhead for a command that was not used.ROR     mª¿ªm>>> zlmei_at_hotmail.com 06/22/01 12:55PM     >>>Oracle : 8.0.5Platform : SunCurrently we     have cron job every night (starting from 11pm) to do export. I changed     the setting "direct" to "y" two days ago while leaving all other     parameters unchanged, hoping to gain some performance. I am a bit     surprused to find that it did not. It actually took longer to create     dump file with less data to export. The whole exp process takes about 2     hours to finish. Yes, there could be lots of other unix processes     running during that time. But I would still expect to see some     improvement because we are doing this way for quite a while. So my     questions are:1. From your "real" export experience, how much     performance boost did you see when you set "direct=y"?2. If     "direct=y" improves the performance, why would anyone want to use      "direct=n"?Thanks.Guang-- here is my orcle dump     file's time stamp:(dmp.1 and dmp.2 are from direct=y,dmp.3, dmp.4     and dmp.5 are from direct=n).-rw-rw-r--   1     mt       prog    
    1042197132 Jun 18 01:05 oracle.dmp.5.gz-rw-rw-r--   1     mt       prog    
    1042375633 Jun 19 01:04 oracle.dmp.4.gz-rw-rw-r--   1     mt       prog    
    1042556662 Jun 20 00:25 oracle.dmp.3.gz-rw-rw-r--   1     mt       prog    
    1034773279 Jun 21 01:17 oracle.dmp.2.gz-rw-rw-r--   1     mt       prog    
    1035237986 Jun 22 01:22 oracle.dmp.1.gz--here is the parameter     file:BUFFER = 64000COMPRESS = YCONSISTENT = NCONSTRAINTS =

    YDIRECT = YFILE = /oracle/exports/oracle.dmp.pipe#FULL = 
    YGRANTS = YINDEXES = YLOG = /oracle/exports/export.logROWS = 
    YUSERID = xxx/yyyOWNER = 
    (aaa,bbb)_________________________________________________________________Get 
    your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <A     href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com --     Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: <A     href="http://www.orafaq.com">http://www.orafaq.com -- Author:     Guang Mei  INET: zlmei_at_hotmail.com Fat City Network     Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858)     538-5051San Diego, California        Received on Fri Jun 22 2001 - 15:05:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US