RE: OPS on Tru64 - Followup

From: Mohan, Ross <MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:34:54 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0033208D.20010621082048@fatcity.com>

Note:118005.1 says, at one point, that the DLM_LOCKS_CFG parameter is "the maximum amount of DLM locks available" this is somewhat misleading and therefore somewhat dangerous. Our SAs set it to the "maximum" and (yes, foolishly, i think) wound up setting it to about 1GB, and getting a kernel problem.

More likely, the Note should say:

"Set DLM_LOCKS_CFG to twice the number of peak locks anticipated"

or somesuch.

Anyone from Oracle care to comment on how best to put in a document change request to spare someone else this potential pain?

• Ross

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:32 AM
To: 'ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com'

Anyone out there using OPS ver7 on Tru64 Alpha?

I'd be interested in swapping DLM parameters.

We just applied an OWS-suggested fix and it apparently ran the box into the ground.

Any thoughts welcome.
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Mohan, Ross
  INET: MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:34:54 CDT