Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> consistency in cost?

consistency in cost?

From: Henry Poras <Henry.Poras_at_ctp.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 21:08:45 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.002FBA0F.20010507205527@fatcity.com>

I am working with an 8.1.6 database on Solaris 2.6 and I am wondering if there is any consistency in the optimizer. We have two nearly identical databases (one a clone from two weeks ago). A five table join has nearly the identical execution plan on the two databases. The difference is in the access method of the fourth table in the join; in one case it is accessed by a FTS and in the other, by Index. This difference has a large effect on performance. Statistics are nearly identical for this table in both databases (I looked at dba_tables, dba_indexes, dba_col_tables). Also, the init.ora is the same. When I changed the optimizer_mode to rule and added a 'choose' hint to the query, the execution plan was different again. I will look into this a bit further and post my results. Just wondering about other's experiences. Thanks.

Henry
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Henry Poras
  INET: Henry.Poras_at_ctp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Mon May 07 2001 - 23:08:45 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US