RE: Oracle vs DB2

trying again...

> From: "Eric D. Pierce" <PierceED_at_csus.edu>
> To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:56:08 -0700
> Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2

>
> Reportedly what IBM did here some years ago, was sell a
> mainframe hardware package (for a COBOL/VSAM package) within
> the University system's budget constraints.
>
> Turned out that to actually run the application, several
> millions of $ of additional "goodies" were needed.
>
> But, they got the original bid.
>
> Dealing with IBM mainframe sales critters (apparently recruited
> directly from some boot camp for counter terrorism?) was not
> exactly the same as dealing with DEC sales critters.
>
>
>
> On 24 Apr 2001, at 13:00, Ed.Haskins_at_VerizonWireless.com wrote:
>
> > It's that "ancillary business" you better watch out for!! IBM is using DB2
> > as their "Loss-Leader".
>
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: PierceED_at_csus.edu

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).