Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle 9i Release (May?)

RE: Oracle 9i Release (May?)

From: Haskins, Ed <Ed.Haskins_at_VerizonWireless.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:35:43 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.002ED46F.20010419143902@fatcity.com>

Rich,

There was no "log_archive_start" because it was a benchmark for a data warehouse...which (way more) typically...doesn't operate in ARCHIVELOG mode.

Ed Haskins
Oracle DBA
Verizon Wireless

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:36 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

For anyone wanting to see how they created the 3TB database, check out the Full Disclosure Report at
http://www.tpc.org/results/FDR/tpch/sun.e10k.3tb.010417.fdr.pdf It contains all the init.oras, Solaris parameters, and the DB creation scripts.

It's quite a hoot to see 32GB redos! I did notice the lack of "log_archive_start" anywhere, which would explain why there was no mention of
unbelievably long archive write times... :)

Also, the claim that the 9i TPC-H 3TB benchmark beat DB2's 1TB marks appears to be just "alleged" and not "convicted", as per the TPC webpage.

Enjoy!

Rich Jesse                          System/Database Administrator
Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com             Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Travis [mailto:c-glenn.travis_at_wcom.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 14:51
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Oracle 9i Release (May?)
>
>
> Article Title: Oracle ups the 9i volume
> Source: the451
> Date: 19 Apr 2001
>
> by: the451, special to searchDatabase
>

...
> Oracle has published its first benchmark, a TPC-H decision
> support test,
> which was run against a 3TB database on Sun Microsystems hardware and
> allegedly achieved better results than an IBM DB2 database
> running at 1TB on
> IBM hardware. Burton claims the result is even more striking


This message has been scanned for viruses with Trend Micro's Interscan VirusWall.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Haskins, Ed
  INET: Ed.Haskins_at_VerizonWireless.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Apr 19 2001 - 16:35:43 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US