RE: 9iAS -- Boxes on which to run

Jared,

Even though it was easier to support (which can add up to cost savings) was the performance a problem for you where on the Intel boxes?

Regards,

Larry G. Elkins
elkinsl_at_flash.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill_at_cybcon.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:14 PM
> To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com; elkinsl_at_flash.net
> Subject: Re: 9iAS -- Boxes on which to run
>
>
>
> Sorry to hear this Larry.
>
> At BlueCross we moved the server off of Intel ( Dual 500 MHZ, NT
> 4.0 ) because
> it was *so* much easier to support on Solaris. This sounds like
> a backwards
> move that probably cost more in the long run due to maintenance
> and downtime.
>
> Jared
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: elkinsl_at_flash.net

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).