Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Parallel index builds can crash

RE: Parallel index builds can crash

From: Tim Sawmiller <sawmillert_at_state.mi.us>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 09:13:28 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.002E54C5.20010409085433@fatcity.com>

Well, duh, of course you're going to get 12 pieces, each of initial xxx size. How else can it do a parallel creation? Seems pretty intuitive to me...but then, I'm a pretty smart guy!

         8-)

>>> lkoivu_at_qode.com 04/09/01 11:55AM >>>
Hello Dick,

YOU ARE KIDDING. I've done this many times in the past and never encountered that type of behavior... I don't see what version/OS you are running? Was the table partitioned?

And, back by popular demand, is my highly overrated signature  

Lisa Rutland Koivu
Oracle Database Administrator
lkoivu_at_qode.com  

 NeoMedia  

2201 Second St., Suite 600
Fort Myers, FL 33901, USA
Phone: 941-337-3434
Fax: 941-337-3668

www.neom.com <http://www.neom.com> 
www.paperclick.com <http://www.paperclick.com> 
www.qode.com <http://www.qode.com> 
 

P a p e r C l i c k . c o m <http://www.paperclick.com/home.htm>  

 Enter Your PaperClick Code Here!    

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

To ALL,

    Over the weekend I've been trying to rebuild a VERY large index on a data
warehouse table. Well in an attempt to get faster processing I invoked the parallel option, but the index failed for the one reason I could not easily figure out. I expected the index to be 4 to 5 GB in size when completed, but it
tried to create itself at 8 to 10 GB instead. Odd I thought until this morning
when I noticed that there was two temporary segments in the target tablespace.
I submitted a TAR to OTS for an explanation (Attached). Basically if you do your index builds in parallel one should expect them to be the estimated size
times the parallel setting. OOPS!!! :-( Someone can correct me if they know
otherwise, but I don't remember seeing this in any of the documentation.

BTW: The final index size, now that it did successfully complete, is twice what
I expected (parallel 2).

Dick Goulet

____________________Forward Header_____________________
Author: rdbms4_at_us.oracle.com (Oracle Support)
Date:       4/9/2001 10:33 AM

 Hello Richard,

Creating Indexes in Parallel

Parallel index creation works in much the same way as a table scan with an ORDER
BY clause. The table is randomly sampled and a set of index keys is found that
equally divides the index into the same number of pieces as the degree of parallelism(DOP). A first set of query processes scans the table, extracts key,
ROWID pairs, and sends each pair to a process in a second set of query processes
based on key. Each process in the second set sorts the keys and builds an index
in the usual fashion.
After all index pieces are built, the parallel coordinator simply concatenates
the pieces (which are ordered) to form the final index.

Parallel local index creation uses a single server set. Each server process in
the set is assigned a table partition to scan, and for which to build an index partition. Because half as many server processes are
used for a given DOP, parallel local index creation can be run with a higher DOP.

          Note:

          When creating an index in parallel, the STORAGE clause refers to the
storage of each of the subindexes created by the query server processes.
Therefore, an index created with an INITIAL

          of 5MB and a DOP of 12 consumes at least 60MB of storage during index
creation because each process starts with an extent of 5MB. When the query
coordinator process combines the sorted subindexes, some of the extents may
be trimmed, and the resulting index may be smaller than the requested 60MB.

ORA-1652
>From version 7.x, we can create certain objects in parallel, or
unrecoverable.
In order for Oracle to accomplish this, temporary segments are created that eventually become a permanent part of the object, yet Oracle still refers to

them as temp segments. Thus, most of the time you receive this error, it will
be referring to the tablespace the object is going to be created in.

Do the following query to find out if you're out of extents:   

    select max(blocks), max (bytes) from sys.dba_free_space       where tablespace_name = '<tablespace in error message>';  

For example, The above query may return:  SQL> blocks bytes

         6143 12,580,864  

Notice that the biggest CONTIGUOUS block of free space is only 6143 blocks and
Oracle needs a contiguous block of free space of 6144 to create an object.  

You may have a lot of free space in separate blocks in your tablespace, but if
it is not contiguous, Oracle cannot use it. Allocating extents requires that

there be a contiguous block of free space.

SOLUTION:
1. Add a datafile to the tablespace
2. Adjust the storage parameters of the object you are trying to create.

   Parameters to look at: initial extent, next extent, pct increase. 3. If you have a lot of free space in that tablespace, but the it is

   very fragmented, you may want to consider rebuilding the tablespace. 4. Enable AUTOEXTEND for the datafile  

Please update the tar via metalink.
 Thank you,
Oracle Support Services.        

Have you tried MetaLink?
Search our technical libraries, create/review/update your TARs at: http://metalink.oracle.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: 
  INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com 

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Tim Sawmiller
  INET: sawmillert_at_state.mi.us

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Apr 09 2001 - 11:13:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US