Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Standard vs Enterprise Edition

Re: Standard vs Enterprise Edition

From: Paul Drake <paled_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:40:06 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.002DB020.20010328230021@fatcity.com>

Kevin,

I know that you run on NT. So do I. Big deal. You can still run on 4 CPUs, with a 5 named user license, provided you're running Std Ed.
If those are 4 x 1 GHx - that's a $400,000.00 license. For $1500. 5 named users is all it takes.
Ain't life grand? You know, you can do alot of coding for $200,000.00. Lots.
Unless the database relies upon parallel query option, advanced replication, managed standby or bitmap indicies, I'd say - go with the pricing of standard edition, and use a beter architect.

Throw some money at I/O - instead of licen$e.

interMedia and iFS are included with 8.1.7 Standard Edition.

of course, if you have MEGA batch jobs to run that would take advantage of PQO ... it depends ...

Paul

> Kevin Kostyszyn wrote:
>
> We also have a client that wants to use Standard because it is less
> expensive. I tried to install 8.1.6 SE on an NT server that already
> had EE on it. I made it a multihomed machine but ran into a problem
> with a dll. Seems to be a known bug, needless to say, it might have
> ruined my installation of Veritas Backup Exec, just thought I would
> mention it. I have been getting some very strange errors on the
> machine since I installed, I think I will move it to an empty
> machine. As far as the differences are concerned, i don't know yet.
> Kev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of
> Thomas Jeff
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standard vs Enterprise Edition
>
> Due to Oracle's licensing shenanigans, we are looking at the
> use of the Standard
> edition to save $$$$. In fact, our management may even make
> Standard the de facto
> standard while requiring justification for Enterprise.
>
> If anyone is currently using Standard, or has experience
> with it, I would appreciate if
> can you tell me what I lose by moving to Standard. I've
> perused the features comparision
> matrix, but I'd like to see some other feedback to ensure
> I'm not overlooking anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff T
> thomasje_at_tce.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Paul Drake
  INET: paled_at_home.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 01:40:06 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US