Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Rolling Upgrade of Oracle on a 24*7 implementation

RE: Rolling Upgrade of Oracle on a 24*7 implementation

From: Mohan, Ross <MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:23:20 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.002BB12A.20010222121642@fatcity.com>

Gary,

<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2> 
i wish
i knew the answers to those good questions.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2>Consider though, that until recently the DLM was the job of the OS vendor
NOT
the dbms vendor and so a dbms version tick changed nothing in that
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2>regard.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2> 
as for
DD upgrades...<shrug>...praps the init.ora parameter compatible is not set
to the
newest version until the latest upgrade is in place? Just a guess.

<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2> 
For a
real answer, you'd have to open an iTar, and head to Tibet to meditate
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2>yourself into Perfect SelfTranscendence before getting an answer from the hamster
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2>running MetaStink.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2> 
 

  <FONT face="Times New Roman"
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Gary Weber   [mailto:gweber_at_cji.com]Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 2:56   PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:   Rolling Upgrade of Oracle on a 24*7 implementation   So,
  when freshly upgraded box comes online, lock manager doesn't have a problem   with different versions? And on related note, at what point is the data   dictionary upgraded? Having never done this, I'm rather   curious....
  <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
  size=2> 
  <FONT face=Tahoma
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: root_at_fatcity.com   [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Mohan, RossSent:   Thursday, February 22, 2001 2:26 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list   ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Rolling Upgrade of Oracle on a 24*7   implementation
  You can do rolling upgrades on OPS, yes.   For quite some time, now....not a "new feature" either.   

  -----Original Message----- From: Gary   Weber [mailto:gweber_at_cji.com]
  Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 2:04 PM <FONT   size=2>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <FONT   size=2>Subject: RE: Rolling Upgrade of Oracle on a 24*7 implementation   

  Not 100% sure, but I don't believe you can do a "rolling"   upgrade in OPS configuration. All or nothing deal it   seems. I can't imagine DLM capable of operating with   different Oracle versions in multiple instances. My guess is, <FONT   size=2>you could upgrade one box in the cluster at a time, but you would need   to have a black out for the last box. Again, this is   only a guess.
  Gary
  -----Original Message----- <FONT
  size=2>Vallath Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:41   PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L   

  Any body have ideas on how a Oracle Upgrade is done in a 24*7   installation for a very large database specifically   using OPS.
    Received on Thu Feb 22 2001 - 14:23:20 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US