Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RE: OT NT2K vs Unix.

RE: RE: OT NT2K vs Unix.

From: Kevin Kostyszyn <kevin_at_dulcian.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:46:43 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.002A8343.20010201141231@fatcity.com>

What about Mechwarrior or Quake II, can I run that on Unix and will it run smoothly? This is a fun debate, but I do agree there will never be a winner.

-----Original Message-----
dgoulet_at_vicr.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:45 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

I believe I've seen a shareware version of that out on the web somewhere for various flavors of Unix with X-windows.

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Author: "Kevin Kostyszyn" <kevin_at_dulcian.com>
Date:       2/1/2001 1:18 PM

Oh, and not only that, I like the GUI a lot more than I like command based programming...unless.....can you play solitaire on Unix:)   -----Original Message-----
  From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Rocky Welch   Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:28 PM   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L   Subject: RE: OT NT2K vs Unix.

  From the URL:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/solutions/overview/r eliable/default.asp

  PCs Stay Up and Running
  Memory conflicts and missing or altered system files caused many of the system crashes prior to Windows 2000. To put an end to these problems, we changed Windows 2000 memory management to reduce the chance that software applications will interfere with one another.

  Applications runing in a seprate memory area...HMMMMMM Unix did that 15 years ago.

  Fewer Reboots
  Performing routine maintenance on your system requires significantly fewer reboots, therefore less downtime, with Windows 2000. In addition, with its support for Plug and Play, Windows 2000 automatically recognizes and adapts to hardware changes. This means users can easily add hardware devices such as scanners, DVD players, and speakers without rebooting, and with less potential for user error.

  Reboots are also reduced-and reliability increased-through the Microsoft hardware device driver certification program. This program helps ensure that hardware drivers are compatible with Windows 2000, and do not require a reboot after installation. Certified drivers are tested and digitally signed by Microsoft. If Windows 2000 detects a driver that Microsoft has not digitally signed, it warns users about the risk before they install it on their system

  Not having to reboot after installing an application....Unix from it's beginings.

  How Much More Reliable Is Windows 2000 Professional?   Third-party studies that assess reliability from three different perspectives-lab-based testing, customer-site measurement, and user perceptions-conclude that Windows 2000 Professional is the most reliable desktop operating system.

  Highest Reliability in Production Environments   NSTL collected uptime data in the real-world environment of several customer sites and concluded that the average system uptime between failures of Windows 2000 Professional is 13 times more than that of Windows 98 and three times more than that of Windows NT Workstation 4.0.

  Notice no comparison to Unix. It's like people that hangout with socially unacceptable people to make themselves look better (Hey! Wait a minute! Is that why alot of people want to hang out with me? ). I guess you're right they aren't the same. Unix posts much higher numbers.

  Sorry, it's sarcastic Thursdsay here. I love the debate about Windows and Unix. ;o)

    Kevin Kostyszyn <kevin_at_dulcian.com> wrote:

    I would disagree with that, how is Windows becoming like Unix?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Rocky
Welch
      Sennt: Thursday, February 01, 2001 2:01 PM
      To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
      Subject: Re: OT NT2K vs Unix.





      The same prediction was made at least 5 years ago. At the rate
Microsoft is going, Windows will be a direct form of Unix. It becomes more like it with every release.

      -Rocky

        "Mohan, Ross" <MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com> wrote:

        Yea, but......

        Win2K Datacenter will just decimate Unix. I predict that, in
        5 years, there will be two or three Unix vendors, fighting over
        the 45% of the market that DataCenter hasn't eaten.





-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Orr [mailto:sorr_at_arzoo.com]]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:01 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: OT_RE:_Ref._:_Re:_asyn_i/o_on_sun_ Close. It's Dave Cutler. There's too much old DOS/Windows backward compatibility for WinNT/2000 to achieve stability like VMS despite Cutler's leadership. I knew VMS and you, Mr. NT, are no VMS! With apologies to Senator Bentsen, Steve Orr
-----Original Message-----
stephane Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:22 AM&< To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L NT is based on VMS (talk about a real OS) and if my memory is good the guy's name is Cutter. Do I win a toaster ? a microwave oven ? a palm-pilot ? --- "Mohan, Ross" <MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com> a ecrit : > "...Standing, corrected, and sniggering....." > Odd picture, that...... > > > Anyways, pop quiz: > > On what OS kernel technology is NT based? > > Who was the original designer and what was his/her > first OS? > > -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.oraaafaq.com -- Author: Steve Orr INET: sorr_at_arzoo.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California && -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? - Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail Personal Address -
only $35 a year!
--
  Do You Yahoo!?
  - Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail Personal Address -
only $35 a year!
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4207.2601" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=125085120-01022001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Oh,
and not only that, I like the GUI a lot more than I like command based
programming...unless.....can you play solitaire on
Unix:)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> root_at_fatcity.com
  [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Rocky Welch<BR><B>Sent:</B>
  Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:28 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Multiple recipients of
list
  ORACLE-L<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: OT NT2K vs Unix.<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <P>From the URL:</P>
  <P><A

href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/solutions/over
vi
ew/reliable/default.asp">http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professi
onal
/solutions/overview/reliable/default.asp</A></P>
  <H3>PCs Stay Up and Running</H3>
  <P>Memory conflicts and missing or altered system files caused many of the
  system crashes prior to Windows 2000. To put an end to these problems, we
  changed Windows 2000 memory management to reduce the chance that software
  applications will interfere with one another. </P>
  <P>Applications runing in a seprate memory area...HMMMMMM Unix did that 15
  years ago.</P>
  <H3>Fewer Reboots</H3>
  <P>Performing routine maintenance on your system requires significantly
fewer
  reboots, therefore less downtime, with Windows 2000. In addition, with its
  support for Plug and Play, Windows 2000 automatically recognizes and
adapts to

  hardware changes. This means users can easily add hardware devices such as
  scanners, DVD players, and speakers without rebooting, and with less
potential

  for user error.</P>
  <P>Reboots are also reduced-and reliability increased-through the
Microsoft
  hardware device driver certification program. This program helps ensure
that
  hardware drivers are compatible with Windows 2000, and do not require a
reboot

  after installation. Certified drivers are tested and digitally signed by
  Microsoft. If Windows 2000 detects a driver that Microsoft has not
digitally
  signed, it warns users about the risk before they install it on their
  system</P><A

href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/solutions/over
vi
ew/reliable/default.asp"></A>
  <P>Not having to reboot after installing an application....Unix from it's
  beginings.
  <H3>How Much More Reliable Is Windows&nbsp;2000&nbsp;Professional?</H3>
  <P>Third-party studies that assess reliability from three different
  perspectives-lab-based testing, customer-site measurement, and user
  perceptions-conclude that Windows&nbsp;2000&nbsp;Professional is the most
  reliable desktop operating system.</P>
  <H3>Highest Reliability in Production Environments</H3>
  <P><A

href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/reviews/nstl.a
sp
">NSTL
  collected uptime data</A> in the real-world environment of several
customer
  sites and concluded that the average system uptime between failures of
  Windows&nbsp;2000&nbsp;Professional is 13 times more than that of
  Windows&nbsp;98 and three times more than that of
  Windows&nbsp;NT&nbsp;Workstation&nbsp;4.0.</P>
  <P>Notice no comparison to Unix. It's like people that hangout with
socially
  unacceptable people to make themselves look better (Hey! Wait a minute! Is
  that why alot of people want to hang out with me? ). I guess you're right
they

  aren't the same. Unix posts much higher numbers.
  <P>Sorry, it's sarcastic Thursdsay here. I love the debate about Windows
and
  Unix. ;o)
  <P>&nbsp; <B><I>Kevin Kostyszyn &lt;kevin_at_dulcian.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:
<BR>
  <BLOCKQUOTE
  style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px
solid"><BR>
    <META content="MSHTML 5.50.4207.2601" name=GENERATOR><BR>
    <DIV><SPAN class=312000819-01022001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>I
    would disagree with that, how is Windows becoming like
    Unix?</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
    <BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
      <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
      size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> root_at_fatcity.com
      [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Rocky
Welch<BR><B>Sennt:</B>
      Thursday, February 01, 2001 2:01 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Multiple recipients
of
      list ORACLE-L<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: OT NT2K vs
      Unix.<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR>
      <P><BR>The same prediction was made at least 5 years ago. At the rate
      Microsoft is going, Windows will be a direct form of Unix. It becomes
more

      like it with every release. <BR>
      <P>-Rocky <BR>
      <P>&nbsp; <B><I>"Mohan, Ross" &lt;MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com&gt;</I></B>
wrote:
      <BR><BR>
      <BLOCKQUOTE
      style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px
solid"><BR><BR>
        <META content="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"
        name=Generator><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>Yea, but......</FONT> </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>Win2K Datacenter will just decimate Unix. I predict
        that, in</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>5 years, there will be two or three
        Unix vendors, fighting over</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>the 45% of the
        market that DataCenter hasn't eaten. </FONT></P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>From:

        Steve Orr [<A
        href="mailto:sorr_at_arzoo.com">mailto:sorr_at_arzoo.com</A>]]]</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:01 PM</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>Subject: RE:
OT_RE:_R&eacute;f._:_Re:_asyn_i/o_on_sun_</FONT>
        </P><BR><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>Close. It's Dave Cutler. There's too much old
        DOS/Windows backward</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>compatibility for
        WinNT/2000 to achieve stability like VMS despite Cutler's</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>leadership.</FONT> </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>I knew VMS and you, Mr. NT, are no VMS!</FONT>
        </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>With apologies to Senator Bentsen,</FONT> <BR><FONT
        size=2>Steve Orr</FONT> </P><BR><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT
        size=2>stephane</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Thursday, February 01,
        2001 9:22 AM&amp;&lt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>To: Multiple
recipients of

        list ORACLE-L</FONT> </P><BR><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>NT is based on VMS (talk about a real OS) and if
        my</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>memory is good the guy's name is
        Cutter.</FONT> </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>Do I win a toaster ? a microwave oven ? a palm-pilot
        ?</FONT> </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>--- "Mohan, Ross" &lt;MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com&gt; a
        &eacute;crit&nbsp;: &gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>"...Standing,&nbsp;
corrected,
        and sniggering....."</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Odd picture,
        that......</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT
        size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Anyways, pop quiz:</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; On what OS kernel
        technology is NT based?</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT
        size=2>&gt; Who was the original designer and what was
his/her</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; first OS?</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>-- </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>Please see the official
        ORACLE-L FAQ: <A target=_blank
        href="http://www.orafaq.com/">http://www.oraaafaq.com</A></FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>-- </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>Author: Steve Orr</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>&nbsp; INET: sorr_at_arzoo.com</FONT> </P><BR><BR>
        <P><FONT size=2>Fat City Network Services&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- (858)
        538-5051&nbsp; FAX: (858) 538-5051</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>San
Diego,
        California&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&amp;&amp;&nbsp; --
Public

        Internet access / Mailing Lists</FONT> <BR><FONT

size=2>-----------------------------------------------------------------
---</FONT>
        <BR><FONT size=2>To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
        E-Mail message</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com
(note
        EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>the
message

        BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L</FONT> <BR><FONT
        size=2>(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
from).&nbsp;
        You may</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>also send the HELP command for other
        information (like subscribing).</FONT> </P></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
      <P><BR><BR>
      <HR SIZE=1>
      <BR><B>Do You Yahoo!?</B><BR>- Get personalized email addresses from
<A
      href="http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Mail Personal
Address</A> -
      only $35 a year!</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
  <P><BR>
  <HR SIZE=1>
  <B>Do You Yahoo!?</B><BR>- Get personalized email addresses from <A
  href="http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Mail Personal Address</A> -
only

  $35 a year!</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Kevin Kostyszyn
  INET: kevin_at_dulcian.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Feb 01 2001 - 16:46:43 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US