Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: URGENT: Why are there so many Oracle (LOCAL=NO) processes?

RE: URGENT: Why are there so many Oracle (LOCAL=NO) processes?

From: Holman, Rodney <rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:42:06 -0600
Message-Id: <10731.125752@fatcity.com>


Larry,
Check your listener.log file to see if it is generating a lot of errors. You may need to bounce the listener to clear it. I have seen this when the listener starts erroring and for some reason goes through some sort of infinite connect loop.

HTH Rodd Holman

 -----Original Message-----

From: 	Larry Taylor [mailto:ltaylor_at_iq.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:27 PM
To:	Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:	URGENT: Why are there so many Oracle (LOCAL=NO) processes?

Does anyone know why so many of these Oracle processes named (LOCAL=NO) have suddenly shown up? So many in fact, I can't bring up SVRMGR until I kill them, but they keep coming back!

  oracle  9739     1  0 10:09:24 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9687     1  0 09:59:15 ?        0:08 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9691     1  0 09:59:16 ?        1:09 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9695     1  0 09:59:19 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9699     1  0 09:59:19 ?        0:02 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9703     1  0 09:59:25 ?        0:06 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9709     1  0 09:59:49 ?        0:10 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9667     1  0 09:49:58 ?        0:00 ora_d009_shark
  oracle  9713     1  0 10:00:09 ?        0:11 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9685     1  0 09:59:15 ?        0:13 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9721     1  0 10:00:45 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9683     1  0 09:59:15 ?        0:00 /orabin/8.1.6/bin/tnslsnr
LISTENER -inherit
  oracle  9727     1  0 10:01:33 ?        0:01 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9689     1  1 09:59:16 ?        0:33 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9733     1  0 10:05:55 ?        0:02 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9693     1  1 09:59:16 ?        0:13 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9788     1  0 10:36:22 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9697     1  0 09:59:19 ?        0:05 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9792     1  0 10:42:54 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9701     1  0 09:59:23 ?        0:12 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9768     1  0 10:21:05 ?        0:05 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9706     1  0 09:59:35 ?        0:01 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9801     1  0 10:50:08 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9797     1  0 10:44:11 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9820     1  0 10:55:00 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9715     1  0 10:00:14 ?        0:11 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9811     1  0 10:51:14 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9723     1  0 10:00:45 ?        0:05 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9823     1  0 10:56:06 ?        0:03 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9729     1  0 10:03:45 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
  oracle  9829     1  0 10:57:27 ?        0:00 oracleshark (LOCAL=NO)
Received on Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:42:06 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US